If I point out something he's said that's inconsistent with other statements, that's accurate. If I take something he's said like 'build the wall' and call him racist, that's following the narrative.
Beyond that, I can't be more clear. The man's made contradictory statements on political positions - that's a fact, not an opinion or MSM agenda. If you believe him, that's your decision. I don't and it's not from undue influence from the big, bad media.
All I can do is shake my head. You obviously didn't read his post/thread.
Where I've highlighted, Donald Trump has never been a politician before, everything he did before was as a businessman, big difference. But it's part of the corrupt narrative that the establishment and enemedia has done to combine the two
SMH, also the fact that you don't see the enemedia for what it really is, says a lot about you.
CGato
That has to be he most ridiculous reasoning I've ever heard. By that definition, nothing he's ever said prior to announcing his candidacy means anything. The previous summary would also carry no weight, since he held no political office at those times.
I've never held political office, either. However, if I ever ran, you can believe my posting history here would be scrutinized by those who disagree with me, because they'd be correctly construed as political positions – whether I had been elected previously, or not.