My whole point was that there is a narrative out there of Donald Trump built up by the corrupt establishment and the enemedia.
I was trying to point out to you that this post/thread by FenwickBabbitt, pretty much debunks the corrupt establishment and the enemedia's narrative of Donald Trump.
A FReeper discussion on the history of Trump's conservative pro-America positions
You could have just stayed in your enemedia bubble and disagreed but what do you do, you bring in the enemedia, CNN, to try to justify your position. So I point out, they are part of the enemedia trying to work to destroy Trump and now you want to deflect. Talk about being obtuse.
FWIW, one thing I've learned in my lifetime is that the enemedia cannot be trusted for anything. They are full of elitists, statists that love big government and the power that goes with it run by them. They are anti-freedom and anti-liberty and are threatened by an outsider like Trump and what he stands for. Of course they are going to lie, deceive and distort what he stands for because he is a huge threat to their position and power.
I've been around Free Republic since 1998 and read here because this was a great place to vet the news. There were/are smarter and wiser people than I here and 99.9% of the time, they got the news vetted correctly.
That was a great tool to battle statist liberals online until they just got bat-poop crazy because, I believe, they are seeing what they believe, fail, since it has been put further in practice under 0bama. And the 100 year statist progressive movement in this country has failed us big-time when you look at the massive debt it has put this country in.
We have to be so careful because the corrupt establishment and its enemedia is going to try to do anything and everything they can do to deceive Americans in to not tearing down what took them at least 100 years to build. That's one reason they fear Donald Trump so much so we have to be so cautious on what they report on him.
That's why I liked FenwickBabbitt's post/thread so much, because it pretty much debunk's the whole corrupt establishment's narrative on Trump and THAT is what I was trying to point out to you.
CGato
If I point out something he's said that's inconsistent with other statements, that's accurate. If I take something he's said like 'build the wall' and call him racist, that's following the narrative.
Beyond that, I can't be more clear. The man's made contradictory statements on political positions - that's a fact, not an opinion or MSM agenda. If you believe him, that's your decision. I don't and it's not from undue influence from the big, bad media.