Interesting. So, after an extensive, public spectacle of digging into the facts, in which the actual video disproves both his and her statements regarding the incident, where he obviously had numerous discussions over several weeks regarding what happened, you assert that a post-hoc statement shows intentional deception from the start.
Fields accused him of all but throwing her to the floor. From that statement, if it is true that she was not someone he knew by sight, his response becomes much more reasonable. Perhaps exaggerated, but even that is not firmly established given the actual sequence of statements from her and then him.
Unless, of course, you believe him guilty until proven innocent.
You have presented no evidence to support your assertion, FRiend. Have a good day.
Of course I know he's guilty. He's a liar and as guilty as sin, based on my analysis of the video. I'm not a court of law. I can have any opinion I want. You certainly haven't given me any data that changes my opinion.