Replies

I’ve read The Guardian so many times that a pattern is very clear. THEY ARE HARD CORE LEFT which means logic and reasoning is bizarre or missing.

But just for you I will paraphrase their nonsense which you erroneously refer to as “the points”:

* Louis XIV of France: imperious, bouffanted Sun King. NO POINT; IRRELEVANT; USAGE OF ADJECTIVE ‘BOUFFANT’ IS MISCAST; REVEALS GUARDIANS HOMOSEXUAL LEFTIST TENDENCY TO DENIGRATE ANY CAPITALIST PERSONA WHO POSSESSES POWER AND INFLUENCE, I.E. INSERT NAME OF ANY STRONG CAPITALIST, IN ADDITION TO TRUMP, AND THEIR INVECTIVE IS THE SAME.

* ***total*** narcissist, a source ***intimately*** familiar with Trump...declined to be identified, destruction of the United States. TOTAL? WHAT WOULD A 50% NARCISSIST BE LIKE? INTIMATELY? AS IN HIS WIFE OR HIS EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT?

* band of loyalists ... uncouth, combative and ignorant about the mechanics of American politics ... BAND OF LOYALISTS? WHAT WOULD THE GUARDIAN PREFER? A BAND OF TRAITORS? UNCOUTH? AND WHAT IS BILL CLINTON? COMBATIVE? AS OPPOSED TO WAVING A WHITE FLAG? IGNORANT ABOUT THE ‘MECHANICS’? THE GUARDIAN IS COMPILED IN THE UK AND THEY KNOW BETTER THAN PEOPLE THAT HAVE DEALT WITH THE US CONGRESS UP CLOSE? ARE COREY LEWANDOWSKI, BARRY BENNETT, PAUL MANAFORT, RICK WILEY NEW TO AMERICAN POLITICS? THE GUARDIAN HERE IS NOT MAKING ‘POINTS’, THEY ARE THROWING A FIT, A TYPICAL LEFTIST FIT.

* Trump inches closer ... hands on the levers controlling the world’s richest economy and a military of unparalleled might. THE REAL POINT HERE IS THE HOMOSEXUALS AT THE GUARDIAN ARE SHITTING THEIR PANTS. OH! HOW UNCOUTH!

* MICHAEL COHEN, COREY LEWANDOWSKI, HOPE HICKS, MICHAEL GLASSNER, BARRY BENNETT, PAUL MANAFORT .... WHY NO MENTION OF RICK WILEY? THE GUARDIAN PUBLISHED THIS TRASH YESTERDAY. IT’S NOT EVEN UP TO DATE. AND THE ADJECTIVES ‘UNCOUTH’, ‘IGNORANT’ ARE SO OFF THAT ‘TRASH’ IS AN IMMEDIATE ADJECTIVE DESCRIBING THE RUMP RANGERS AT THE GUARDIAN.

The rest of this nonsense is diatribe invective, rumor, innuendo and unfounded attacks. It’s tabloid trash.

Note that opening The Guardian includes a splattering of pro-Hillary ads such as “Proud to Stand With Hillary”. That is the first sign the reader is in enemy territory.

Now if you have more than a 2-digit IQ which is doubtful, perhaps you realize The Guardian is worse than trash, it is a bowel movement. Therefore, if you even understand the notion of refinement, you won’t be posting turds like this again.