Inspector Javert.
Of course, Jean Valjean was guilty, you know. Robbed a priest. He just couldn’t prove it.
Same issue here; probable cause exists, but not enough for a prosecution.
So “innocent” is perhaps too strong a word, although this all seems a bit of a tempest in a tea cup.
If shoving someone harshly is assault, I did it 100 times a day when I worked as a bouncer back in college.
No, I don't think it is. I think "innocent" is precisely the correct word to use in this case. He didn't do what he was accused of. Thus he was innocent.
Jean Valjean...oh thank you i knew it was something or other jean....the mind goes to mush as you approach 70 don’t you know...
Yeah there was enough to do what they did...arrest...but certainly not enough to press charges cause you know Trump would have paid for top defense team against a county prosecutors office in a county Trump knows very well...and besides she was “inside” the SS Bubble of protection and this was her second trip inside so she KNEW she was wrong...
I hope the ladies journalistic carreer goes down the ole crapper...
probably already has I have no idea where she left when she left Brietbart...
Jean had stolen a loaf of bread, did time, was finally let out and then stopped ta the priest's home. yes, he did steal some silver pieces, but the priest said that he had given it to him, so that was NEVER the reason that Javert was after him.
Valjean NEVER showed up to where he is supposed to go, changes his name, several times, and Javert keeps running into him throughout the book. He wants to drag him back to prison, for BREAKING PAROLE!
And the thing is, Fields touched Trump TWICE, was warned off bu the SS TWICE and was going after Trump for the THIRD time, when Cory intervened. According to the LAW, Fields is the GUILTY one, who broke the law. She's a liar and a damned DRAMA QUEEN, whose mother is a lefty LA RAZA biatch!