Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dware

“there were no presidential caucuses. “

That’s what is called a lie. My precinct sat at a table, people who wanted to talk about a specific presidential candidates had time to talk. We had people present their case for Trump, Carson and Cruz. Then we voted, Cruz won in my precinct. Then we voted who was going to the county and state assemblies to represent us. Same as it’s always been. The delegates at the state assemblies aren’t some party insiders, they are elected at their precincts and their precincts voted for which candidate their delegate is supposed to vote for. It’s a stupid system but it’s the system we’ve had ever since I’ve been involved. We have never had a binding straw poll at the caucuses.


28 posted on 04/13/2016 3:08:14 PM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: thorvaldr
Cruz won in my precinct

Was it binding?

We have never had a binding straw poll at the caucuses.

No, it wasn't binding. Per the Denver post:

"Colorado will not vote for a Republican candidate for president at its 2016" and "The GOP executive committee has voted to cancel the traditional presidential preference poll after the national party changed its rules to require a state's delegates to support the candidate who wins the caucus vote."

There was no presidential caucus. I don't care what y'all gas bags were talking about at your table. It wasn't binding, there was no binding presidential caucus, and my vote was ignored.

33 posted on 04/13/2016 3:31:58 PM PDT by dware (sCruzballs are working awful hard to elect Hitlery! Why do they hate America so?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson