“If by the conditions of one’s birth they are NOT a citizen at birth, then they are naturalized and not natural born.”
No, that garbage was inserted into the U.S. State Department Foreign Affairs Manual to serve as a cover for the efforts to put these ineligible characters into the White House. Members of Congress tried for years to get bills passed that would amend the Constitution for the purpose of removing the natural born citizen clause. When each and everyone of the bills failed to be passed by Congress, they shifted their efforts to just disregarding the natural born citizen clause and pretend they could just redefine naturalized citizens as natural born citizens by playing around with the definition of naturalization and natural born citizenship. Looking back into history before about 1990-2000 you find no one was acquiring U.S. British, or English citizenship as a natural born citizen if they were born abroad without some form of diplomatic immunity. All persons born abroad could acquire citizenship only by birth within the jurisdiction of the sovereign and two citizen parents. Those British subjects who were not also British citizens could acquire status as a British subject only by the authority of a British naturalization act that naturalized them as British subjects.
This whole myth that birth with a citizen parent makes a person a natural born citizen is a fraud and a scam. From 1802 to 1855 and later for some people, a child born abroad with TWO U.S. CITIZEN PARENTS did not qualify for U.S. citizenship of any kind, natural born citizenship or naturalized citizenship, because there was no statutory naturalization law in existence to provide naturalized citizenship.
The judge in this case needs to be impeached.
Judges in five other states plus appointed citizens on elections boards in three states ruled the exact same way as the New Jersey judge.
No judge which upholds the law should even be questioned much less impeached.