Skip to comments.
Sonya Sotomayor: What the Supreme Court really needs is more diversity
Hotair ^
| 04/11/2016
| Jazz Shaw
Posted on 04/11/2016 7:30:20 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: SeekAndFind
I’d go for an Asian Conservative, a Hispanic Conservative, Jewish Conservative, Indian Conservative, Female conservative, Black female conservative.... how many more we need?
41
posted on
04/11/2016 8:37:48 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(My positions can evolve, but Principles should be immutable.)
To: SeekAndFind
Less stupid Latinas would be good. ;o)
42
posted on
04/11/2016 8:37:55 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: Exit148
Funny stuff right there. lol
To: SeekAndFind
So I guess The Wise Latina thinks there are too many Jewish justices?
44
posted on
04/11/2016 8:52:02 AM PDT
by
A_Former_Democrat
(This household proudly voted for TRUMP)
To: SeekAndFind
Both Democrats and Republicans apply such litmus tests to Supreme Court nominees that nobody with an original thought is likely to make it through the process. If that statement were true of both democrats AND REPUBLICANS, then neither Sotomayer nor Kegan would have been confirmed to the subprime court.
To: SeekAndFind
Fewer liberals. Judges needed who have common sense.
To: freefdny
That’s right, I forgot! Never mind. /s
47
posted on
04/11/2016 9:21:25 AM PDT
by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: servantboy777
>>Diversity already there. Black, Jewish, Hispanic, Female, Male, White, Lesbian.<<
No midgets, Eskimos, Native American Indians, goat humpers or half breeds.
48
posted on
04/11/2016 9:27:10 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(https://www.22kill.com/)
To: SeekAndFind
Diversity? How about nominating an uneducated bus driver from Venzuala?
49
posted on
04/11/2016 9:29:28 AM PDT
by
Slyfox
(Donald Trump's First Principle is the Art of the Deal)
To: SeekAndFind
Obama’s response to nominating a “white guy?” Heck, I could have nominated a lesbian from Skokie!” I hate to inform the president but in baseball parlance it’s “three strikes and you’re out!”
50
posted on
04/11/2016 10:04:14 AM PDT
by
RU88
(Bow to no man)
To: SeekAndFind
What the SCOTUS needs is one less wise Latina.
51
posted on
04/11/2016 10:07:58 AM PDT
by
Nuc 1.1
(Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
To: Buckeye McFrog
She’s more than welcome to step down to make room for an outsider who would contribute more to diversity than she has. She’d be happy to have a couple of justices who are cosmetically varied but who all think exactly alike.
52
posted on
04/11/2016 10:37:16 AM PDT
by
DPMD
To: SeekAndFind
There are no Protestants on the Supremes! No Baptists,
Methodists or Presbyterians, etc.!
Officially, only Catholics and Jews!
Unofficially, a semi-atheist, agnostic, gay-leaning Socialist! One or more!
53
posted on
04/11/2016 12:53:39 PM PDT
by
TRY ONE
(I never got the memo changing the name of Global Warming to Klimate Change)
To: SeekAndFind
So make the hearings look like the bar scene from Star Wars.
54
posted on
04/11/2016 2:04:25 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
To: SeekAndFind
"Sonya Sotomayor: What the Supreme Court really needs is more diversity"
"Sotomayor Diversity."
TRANSLATION: More misinterpretation of the Constitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson