Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Korea’s Armored Fighting Vehicle Is Like the Bradley, But Better
War is Boring ^ | April 10, 2016 | Ed Kim

Posted on 04/10/2016 10:51:04 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2016 10:51:04 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Instead of the Bradley, they could call it the Admiral Yi.


2 posted on 04/10/2016 10:55:07 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Looks plenty bad ass.
They’ll get the bugs out.
Bet it’s a tight squeeze in the back.


3 posted on 04/10/2016 10:57:58 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

From the article...
-
“... Bofors based 40-millimeter autocannon ...
... autocannon ... rate of fire ... 300 rounds per minute ...
... autoloading carousel ... 24 ready rounds can be reloaded quickly ...”
-
Am I reading this right?
300 rounds/minute = 5 rounds/second.
24 rounds of 40mm fired in 5 seconds?


4 posted on 04/10/2016 11:05:16 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Good. They won’t need us anymore.


5 posted on 04/10/2016 11:07:25 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Tanks are awesome. Until you take a larger perspective.


6 posted on 04/10/2016 11:16:02 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Two words: pentagon wars.


7 posted on 04/10/2016 11:16:14 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

The A-10. Love it. Who out there has the most tanks to take out? I don’t think the Norks have the gasoline.


8 posted on 04/10/2016 11:24:01 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Jeez, we ought to open the production lines up again.
The Marine’s need them.


9 posted on 04/10/2016 11:27:19 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why does South Korea need a light APC?

They are not a superpower deploying on short notice around the globe.

If you are in a shooting match in an APC, you have already lost. You have to protect 10 people instead of 3 or 4.

Use feet, helicopters or trucks to get the Infantry to the battlefield, then use big, tough and dependable APCs to close with the enemy.


10 posted on 04/10/2016 11:36:28 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

That’s the way the IDF does it. Converted tanks as APC’s. Great protection. Compatible speeds. If you don’t have to fight “away games” thus is the way to protect your mechanized infantry and support your tanks.


11 posted on 04/10/2016 12:05:10 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
Why does South Korea need a light APC?

Have you ever been on the Korean Ground, in Uniform as an Imfamtryman?

12 posted on 04/10/2016 12:12:05 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
as an Imfamtryman

I can't even pronounce that. :-)

13 posted on 04/10/2016 12:13:34 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I remember lots of rice paddies.


14 posted on 04/10/2016 12:14:10 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Did you ever have to slog through them in Leather Combat Boots with a full Combat load on your back with, your Weapon a the ready?
15 posted on 04/10/2016 12:21:37 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

No, I didn’t go to boot camp until years later. Fort Benning had some nasty swamps, though. I’ll take a ride any time.


16 posted on 04/10/2016 12:28:39 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
I don’t think the Norks have the gasoline.

With the exception of manpower, they don't have much of anything. Their air force consists of leftovers from the 50's and 60's, and Russian hand-me-downs from the 70's and 80's.......

That old adage that an army marches on it's stomach is true, their country is starving and so would their military if they would be stupid enough to go to war again.

Militarily they haven't advanced at all in the past 50 years but yet they posture and bluster for their own people with their military parades and constantly threaten S. Korea........

The financially prosperous S. Korea wouldn't have any problem with them..........

17 posted on 04/10/2016 12:34:19 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
The Korean Rice Paddie’s are just loaded with “CRAP” and I'm being polite, with the word I'm using
18 posted on 04/10/2016 12:45:36 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Yep, you are correct. That will put a hurt on you! Imagine the air burst shells fired at troops... 24 HE air burst shells in 5 seconds, there goes a few squads!


19 posted on 04/10/2016 12:47:03 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Here's some advice for our South Korean allies and friends...never bring an armored vehicle to a nuclear war.
20 posted on 04/10/2016 12:55:52 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson