You have serious reading comprehension and honesty problems. When I reply to your posts, I am really talking to other readers. Your posts are nothing more than a vehicle for me to start from.
ONCE AGAIN the question you dodge:
— How could Bellei lose his citizenship if he never had it to being with? —
Bellei was a natural born citizen from the moment of his birth.
Otherwise, the entire case would be moot.
If Bellei was not a citizen, there would be nothing to be taken away.
How could Bellei lose something he never had?
In order to contemplate stripping Bellei of citizenship, the Court first had to decide if he ever had it to begin with.
The Court does not decide MOOT questions.
Bellei’s citizenship was taken away only because he HAD IT at birth.
If he did not have it at birth, then there was nothing for the government to take away.
There is the comprehension problem right there.
You need to learn HOW to read court cases.
Don’t forget that only people born on a Tuesday between 3:00 PM an 8:00 PM are natural born citizens.
It says it right there in the Constitution.