Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moseley
-- The law does not identify cases as "denaturalization" cases or something else. --

Kungys v. United States, 485 U.S. 759 (1988)

Juozas Kungys seeks our review of a judgment and opinion of the Third Circuit remanding his case for the completion of denaturalization proceedings.

Such "denaturalization" proceedings only pertain to persons who obtain citizenship by naturalization, and such cases can and do occur when the citizenship in question was conferred at birth.

A completely different line of cases, outside of denaturalization cases, exists for persons who are not naturalized, but go from "citizen" to "not citizen." Just for shorthand, I refer to this set as expatriation cases, although the correct use of language has "denaturalization" as a subset of expatriation.

The number of errors in your contentions would make substantive rebuttal tedious. I rank you in the top ten despicable liars on FR. Congratulations!

480 posted on 04/11/2016 6:11:41 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; Moseley; All

I do hope that after you finish eating Moseley’s lunch that you’ll pull that brown paper bag over his head for some cheap laughs for the rest of us? LOL


481 posted on 04/11/2016 6:14:13 AM PDT by mkjessup (We Don't Know. Where Heidi Went. But She Won't Be Married. To The President. Burma Shave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

Cases are not subdivided in the way that you imagine.

Cases ARE strictly limited to the question presented to the court for decision.


484 posted on 04/11/2016 6:16:52 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson