Obama: Clinton Never Jeopardized National Security in Email Case

Newsmax ^ | April 7,2016

[Hojczyk]

Obama, in an interview broadcast on Fox News Sunday, said Clinton has recognized a carelessness on the email issue in which she used a private server for government business.

"But I also think it is important to keep this in perspective," Obama said. "This is somebody who has served her country for four years as secretary of state, and did an outstanding job.

"The Democratic president was asked if the Justice Department investigation would treat the Clinton case impartially.

"I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case," said Obama, who leaves office next year.

"Guaranteed. Full stop. Nobody gets treated differently when it comes to the Justice Department. Because nobody is above the law," he said.

The State Department said this month it has suspended plans for an internal review of whether classified information was properly handled in Clinton's emails at the request of the FBI. The department, complying with a judge's order, has released more than 52,000 emails from Clinton's private server.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Very plausible but I will take slight exception.

Whatever absolution HRC receives even if elected is not immune to a pukefest of leaks. Then what?

Perhaps the plan is to elect HRC with the VP being the real candidate in waiting.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

“There is no realistic possibility ...

Succinctly stated.

[hattend]

This is somebody who has served her country for four years as secretary of state, and did an outstanding job.

Selling us out

[hattend]

Hell, his literary agent told us that in 1991

[utahagen]

“Gettin close, this interview was not for or against Hillary, it was plausible deniability for Obama so when facts nail her, his hands are clean.”

Exactamundo. This isn't over. HRC is in trouble.

[SERKIT]

This is a real simple case if they want it to be, and all it needs to be is a simple case at this point. By her actions, words and the hard evidence, she violated - without questions - the Public Records Act of 1950. No one needs to prove intent, no one needs to determine the classification(s) of the public records. She simply failed to "take care" of public records, whether she stuff papers in her pantsuit, left them on a bus, or removed them from her office....period, full stop, well beyond a smidge of breaking this law - this is de facto stuff.

Secondly, and no one has asked her on camera - if she used her server for email exclusively "out of convenience", how did transact sensitive data on her BlackBerry she has been so infamously pictured handling while on State Department business?