Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: enumerated

Cruz is winning a lot of delegates that will vote Trump first ballot and Cruz second ballot. I posted a link a while ago that shows who each PA delegate has said who they will support. What was funny one guy said three different things to three different papers.

here is the link it is a week old though
http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/10229809-74/delegates-candidates-district

Here is one about Cruz courting delegates
http://triblive.com/news/adminpage/10238241-74/cruz-pennsylvania-donald

Last one gives the counts of each supporter but not the name of the delegate
https://www.facebook.com/stevedeace/posts/563799830466727


13 posted on 04/10/2016 6:49:06 AM PDT by Iowa David (Cruz 2016 - Before it's too late)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Iowa David

I guess I need to find out who the 9 candidates are for the 13th district, and figure out what they’re saying. I’ve voted in nine presidential primaries before (some were slam dunks for an incumbent) but I had no idea the delegates could vote against whoever won their district. I guess I just never paid that much attention. Shame on me.

As I said in a previous post, I’m not one of the people who thinks it’s cheating or stealing, or shenanigans if a candidate is more clever at gaming the system. If candidates wants to get the Republican nomination, and run as a Republican, they have to accept the GOP rules.

Having said that, I do wish voters knew how it really works (as I’m finding out), and revolted, either form a new party that was more accountable to voters, or ran without a party affiliation. Delegates should be bound to vote for the candidate that won the plurality in their district, or state if it’s a winner take all. If a candidate drops out, the delegates should be bound to the runner up. The business of multiple ballots and unbound delegates and insisting on a majority instead of a plurality just provides an opportunity for party elites to manipulate the system rather than bring accountable to the voters.

In the general election, the electoral college delegates are bound to the winner of the popular vote in the state, either winner take all (49 states and DC), or proportionally (two states).

GOP can do what they want, but I would bet that well over 90% of voters do not know how the primary process really works, and if they did, they would not like it.


14 posted on 04/10/2016 1:10:28 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson