Paul Ryan could make 2016 normal again (Good Lord!!)

washingtonpost.com ^ | 4/5/16 | Kathleen Parker

[cotton1706]

One of OUR guys will be the nominee. Conservatives will have been shoved aside. The will of the people will have been thwarted. All will be right with the world once again!!

[Biggirl]

Again Speaker Paul said no.

[dirtboy]

Anyone who longs for what passes for normal in DC nowadays is a craven, corrupt hack who is part of the problem there.

[Paine in the Neck]

Ditch the GOPe's princeling, Paul Ryan.

There is an alternative.

www.paulnehlen.com

[for-q-clinton]

Not going to happen unless Trump & Cruz screw up writing the rules. All they need to do is keep the rule that says in order to receive any votes from delegates you have to have one at least 8 states.

The delegates write the rules all they need to do is have their delegates keep that rule in place and they are the only two that are allowed to win.

[Lopeover]

Yes. It will be slow & methodical, but each one will be removed.

[browniexyz]

Agreed. And this is Kathleen Parker writing, after all! Of course she doesn’t want any big changes in DC!! She’d have to learn some new names.

[VanDeKoik]

“The delegates write the rules “

That’s adorable. You think you have power.

[Mr Apple]

all they need to do is have their delegates keep that rule in place

[Iron Munro]

Paul Ryan could make 2016 normal again

[Mr Apple]

Why is it that every time Cruz speaks, he comes across like a country hick Preacher bellowing inside one of those big tents just off the road.

[dforest]

Because he is another designated loser.

[SecondAmendment]

> Again Speaker Paul said no.

Just like the time he said "no" to running for Speaker ?

[mkjessup]

Why is it that every time Cruz speaks, he comes across like a country hick Preacher bellowing inside one of those big tents just off the road.

Just wait. You ain't seen nothin' yet:

[trebb]

Again Speaker Paul said no.

He said "no" before then insisted (modestly) on some preconditions to saying "yes"......

It's those like him/McConnell/Boner/ and company who are most interested in taking Trump down because he's the biggest threat to the status quo of the entrenched GOPe for the moment. If they manage to take him down, they WILL focus on Cruz ....

[Diogenesis]

FLASHBACK to ROMNEY BACKSTABBING THROUGH PARKER

The Parker-Romney Team attacked Gov. Palin to throw
the previous election (2008) to Obama (for Soros)

Kathleen Parker: "[I]t is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem." "Parker ... says something publicly that many of us have thought privately
but lacked the courage to say out loud - Palin should step down:"

---

"Kathleen Parker: After Interviews, Palin Should Bow Out"

---

Kathleen Parker: "Romney would bring more than squeaky clean qualifications
and youthful good looks to the ticket.
Romney would seem a logical choice."

---

"Parker: Romney raised bar on freedoms"
Kathleen Parker: "If Kennedy's speech was an important landmark in American political history,
Romney's was surpassing. With heartfelt humility and poetic eloquence,
he tracked the nation's struggle with and for freedom."

---

Staggering bigotry of Kathleen Parker - UPDATED"

---

Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney

---

"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"

---

[Iron Munro]

[uglybiker]

[pepsi_junkie]

Well there you go, Cruz wins Wisconsin and makes it look like Trump can’t get the majority, assuring the GOPe gets to select the candidate. And now, a day later, they start with “what we really need is somebody new, not Ted Cruz” stuff.

[Nifster]

And I should believe that? meh