Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76

Didn’t you see the Pennsylvannia Supreme Court ruling for Cruz?


70 posted on 04/04/2016 7:19:34 PM PDT by DrewsDad (Choose Cruz - The Consistent Constitutional Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: DrewsDad

Yes. Did you read Pelligrini’s decision?


73 posted on 04/04/2016 7:23:20 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: DrewsDad; Ray76
Didn’t you see the Pennsylvannia Supreme Court ruling for Cruz?

Did you ? They made no ruling on Cruz's eligibility. All they ruled on was Victor Williams's notice to intervene as an appellant. They denied his motion. The press interprets this as them upholding the lower court ruling for Cruz's eligibility, when it didn't. They haven't heard that case yet.

PER CURIAM

DECIDED: March 31, 2016

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2016, the Order of the

Commonwealth Court is hereby

AFFIRMED.

Victor Williams’s pro se Notice to Intervene as Appellant is DENIED. Appellant’s Application for Oral Argument is DENIED.

89 posted on 04/05/2016 7:02:23 AM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: DrewsDad; Ray76

Sorry. Ignore previous. Misread the Commenwealth line.


90 posted on 04/05/2016 7:07:38 AM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson