Posted on 03/30/2016 4:17:51 PM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
With Heidi Cruz missing in action, a significant Cruz insider – let’s call him John Doe – started cleansing his spirit of what apparently is a more evil Cruz campaign than most of us imagined. At the outset, we are convinced that John Doe is legit. We have seen his employment letter on Cruz campaign stationary. He makes north of $3500 per week. When this is all over, it is John Doe the nation has to thank for being brave enough to come forward. Right now, the only thing that concerns him is that he doesn’t want to get a reputation for being a whistle blower. He stresses that he has been in this business for over 20 years and this is the first campaign that was so dirty that he just has to spill the beans on them.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Mrs. Cruz is sitting next to her mother-in-law. Ted must not love his mother, since she’s sitting so far away.
“The odds that 5 separate women would falsely accuse Cruz are basically nil.”
Whoa. Five women have accused Cruz? I’ve been gone all day. Must have missed something. I didn’t know even one had come forward with allegations.
I think you summarized the whole thing in a nutshell. :)
Saying “Heidi Cruz missing in action” is a LIE!
Heidi is all over the place, and now in Wisconsin with Ted, Carly, their children, et al.
Heidi was in Janesville, Wisconsin, warming up a crowd, campainging with Carly at a diner in Milwaukee, etc.. Goes to show just how uninformed Trump supporters are. :)
Check out the internet and you will see many, many pictures of Heidi campaigning.
Doug Stamper - is that you?.....
“She’s campaigning in Wisconsin with her husband. She was at the Town Hall and in multiple appearances today (along with his mother).”
Glad to see a poster who knows what’s going on.
Wait a minute! This picture!
Is Carlyfornia doing the Oingo Boingo with Ted too?
Exactly. Of course, to be fair, some Cruz supporters do seem quite reasonable. Anyway, here are two excellent points:
1) Never argue with someone who is displaying trollish behavior. As Proverbs 23:9 says, "Don't speak to a fool, for he will despise the insight of your words." I think that's some of the wisest advice I've ever encountered.
2) Never argue with someone who seems, um, "intellectually challenged." ;) I don't think anyone has put it better than Mark Twain did: “Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
Following both #1 and #2 can save a person a ton of time, effort, and misery. :)
Doesn't the NE story involve 5 different women? And isn't the whole story just supposed to be "reporting" what they said? Please correct me if I'm mistaken.
I'm just saying that the odds that 5 different women would supply false information to the NE about Cruz are basically nil. IOW, if Cruz is completely innocent, then the only logical conclusion is that the NE made up the story out of whole cloth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1DULEjJo7c
Bill Still’s Report #750 from tonight—more insider information, including this tidbit:
“And finally, we asked John Doe if there was anything to the allegations in the National Enquirer about Cruz having mistresses.
“It’s 100% true that he has affairs. All top-level staffers got an email directly from Heidi Cruz saying that she knew about it and it was ok, and for us to not concern ourselves with it.”
There is also much more on how Amanda Carpenter was the brainchild for the idea to tell folks about Carson dropping out of the Iowa Caucus—a plan that was hatched on Jan. 15th.
There is also a screenshot of John Doe’s campaign hiring letter with his name blocked out but with his salary noted.
Wise words, thank you, rissole, for taking the time to write them.
Cheers : )
Remember the old joke that goes “its only 99% of lawyers that give the rest a bad name?” We have been burned too many times by other Ivy league lawyers faking being a conservative. John Roberts, Paul Ryan, etc. The DC crowd has it down to an art to create the perception of conservationism to get elected.
So when Cruz popped up rational people were cautious in embracing him - he could be an honest Ivy league lawyer (extremely rare) or just another DC insider playing us for fools. The key is his honesty, If he was manipulative dishonest etc like the rest of the DC faux conservatives crowd then we would know he was just another DC insider playing us for fools again.
As the campaign unfolded his actions, from the Carson deception to the fake summonses to the most recent planned attack on Trump and his wife all while playing lawyer games of deflection parsing, attacking to deflect etc. tipped the balance for many against the possibility hes a rare Ivy League DC insider lawyer who is honest and for America not just the usual beltway destruction of America.
As the details of his private life (Wife is NAU anti-American globalist, etc) and prior mostly hidden actions such as where Cruz drafted much of the Bush Amnesty stuff, helped craft the North American Union stuff gave out teddy bares etc. raised red flags with many who love this country.
Now that hes showing his true colors by wrongly attacking Trump for nothing more then political gain. Insulting Christian values by his conduct almost daily and being deceptive in his communications it makes people angry at him.
Most do not care if the affairs claim is true or not, What we care about is his lying to us about who he was and what he really wants to do to our country.
So its not about the Adultery, its about the Fruit of the tree Cruz has shown us as to who and what he appears to really be - another just another Ivy League lawyer playing conservative for fools to gain power.
So now she's getting a bit frisky too, huh? I guess what's good for the gander... ;) LOL.
Seriously, I don't know much about Heidi, but I do have sympathy for her and especially her kids.
Cheers : )
You are so welcome, Right-wing Librarian. :)
Such a long face. What is Ted doing with John Kerry?
Posted on January 29, 2016
The Bloom Is Off The Ruse
Fairly: “7 folks resigned in last 10 days from Cruz campaign. Cruz slapped them with legal notices to shut up. These folks are good people”
— IOWA for TRUMP (@LandmanMarius) January 29, 2016
This reminds me of when the Monica Lewinski scandal first broke. The Clinton supporters refused to believe anything even after it was proven.
It’s deja vu all over again.
You’re right. That’s why I don’t respond to Cruz supporters if I’m paying attention.
Cruz supporters won’t vote for Trump because they believe he’s not qualified. I won’t vote for Cruz because I think he’s a slime and a fraud.
I hope Monica thanks God every day for Linda Tripp.
Without saving the blue dress, Monica would have been an Arkancide victim for sure.
Two women have been identified. One is a nut job. Both have denied the allegation.
What about the other three?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.