[seowulf]

“Displaying a cross on city property would indicate a preference for Christianity by the City.”

The city displaying a cross on city property would indicate a preference by the city.

What they are doing in this case is interfering with someone's right to free speech on city property.

[alexander_busek]

What they are doing in this case is interfering with someone's right to free speech on city property.

"Someone" doesn't have a right to permanently install a concrete structure on city property.

If city officials allow a Cross, they would also have to tolerate the erection of other and different religious symbols on city propery.

I'm all for eradicating the Muslim terrorist threat, but...

Regards,

[dfwgator]

Well then California better remove all of the “Sans” away from all their city names, like San Francisco, San Diego, etc.