What the heck does all this mean? Is Beck admitting the story is true (at least for one affair (Carpenter?) a few years ago)?
He's pointing the finger towards the gal who went to work for Fiorina's Pac.
OPERATIVE: Anyway, that’s been my story all along. And now this happens. So the way this all fit my theory. Three of the five women National Enquirer obfuscated have been outed. Two of them have flatly denied that they had an affair with Cruz. The third still has not. Why not? And she’s still working for Carly Fiorina supposedly getting twenty thousand a month. Plus there’s records of additional payments to her from a Carly PAC totaling about a hundred and sixty thousand last year. And right before that, the Carly for America PAC got half a million from Cruz’s Keeping the Promise PAC.
So everyone here thinks Beck is a wacko...now everyone is hanging on every word he says?
Cruz denied all of this....if he’s guilty, then let the chips fall where they may. There is no PROOF of anything, so far.
Other than of course that Trump is a serial adulterer.
Beck was saying that *if* it was true about one affair years ago, he would cut Cruz some slack, but if the National Inquirer story was true, it would show no character, and then Beck would have to drop him. Beck went on to describe the 5 reasons he thought the whole thing was not true.
You can hear some of it here: