Notice how you attempt to frame the premise, as if "as soon as it came out" is a viable point given that Cruz may or may not have even known about it until sometime after it came out? He did disavow any connection with it, but I very much doubt this fits your criteria of "denounce", given your attitude that I can see so far.
If yes, please provide quotation and source for Ted Cruz denouncing that ad.
Why, is your own internet broken? Is it that you don't know how to use it or something?
If no, then you just engaged in the same type of distraction lying Ted Cruz does.
You are engaging in lying by making up new terms and calling it "lying."
No. Lying is saying something that you know is untrue. Being mistaken is not lying. Changing your mind about something is not lying. Refusing to accept someone else's stated premise is not lying. Claiming that any of these above three things equate to lying is lying.
Notice that you focus, like your lawyer candidate, on the phrase "as soon as it came out," so you can distract from the fact that he never denounced the ad at all like he claimed. You then write, "he... disavow[ed] any connection with it," which, you, being Mr. Lawyer Apprentice, would understand is different from denouncing the ad itself.
but I very much doubt this fits your criteria of "denounce", given your attitude that I can see so far.
What an idiot you are to write this considering what you just wrote to me.