Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grumpygresh

“IOW, the process is undemocratic; for our own good of course.”

Well, we live in a Republic.

It’s designed to temper the unwise passions of the unwashed masses since 350 BC or whenever they created the model.


38 posted on 03/28/2016 8:08:44 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Trump, and Rubio are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: TheThirdRuffian
It’s designed to temper the unwise passions of the unwashed masses since 350 BC or whenever they created the model.

So there have been Johnnie Walker soaked country club douche bags knowing what's good for everybody else since 350 BC?

49 posted on 03/28/2016 8:14:37 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Dude, I know that we live in a republic. I was referring to the party’s nomination process.

Now, the parties can do what they wish in a republic as the Constitution say nothing about parties. They can sit in a smoke filled room and divine the entrails of a goat as a means of selecting the nominee.

That being said, this should demonstrate that this time, the selection process may not be via popular consent. The people have a reasonable expectation that the party will operate on this basis. If not, the credibility of the party will go down the drain and Whigdom awaits.


56 posted on 03/28/2016 8:19:35 AM PDT by grumpygresh (We don't have Democrats and Republicans, we have the Faustian uni-party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson