Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tophat9000

They were fairly restrained, no full frontal nudity. Soft porn I guess would be the term. Models are sometimes asked to pose in various states of undress, she did what she did. I don’t know that she regrets it, but she’s not out there defending it, either. She’s a wife, mother and businesswoman now.


48 posted on 03/27/2016 11:23:18 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

Let me honest the photo itself is no more provocative than some Renaissance painting.. there are painting in the Vatican that are more provocative

it not hardcore porn........

its not even cable tv only

you can show it on regular tv... with no bars blurring anything....

It was the text added to make it an attack ad ...and who it was meant for, old-school Mormons who think showing the elbows is a sin ....to smear Trumps wife as some kind of “harlot”...

They even describe this as they are trying to “shame” her


114 posted on 03/27/2016 12:28:53 PM PDT by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
fairly restrained, no full frontal nudity. Soft porn I guess would be the term.

It's not like she had sex on video and then made a commercial for the Canadian.

132 posted on 03/27/2016 1:34:52 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Ohhh....Derka derka derka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson