Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: advertising guy
No,it is not

The principal "offenses" at Benghazi were the failure to rescue Ambassador Stevens and the failure to provide fire support to Doherty and Woods.

There is absolutely no question that the decision to commit or to withhold US forces from urban combat in a foreign country is within the authority of the Commander in Chief. His decision in this regard was a legal exercise of his Constitutional authority and could not under any circumstances be a crime.

Of course, the wisdom and propriety of his actions was a completely legitimate subject for the electorate, but unfortunately his opponent in the 2012 election chose not to make an issue of it.

That's it. It's over.

56 posted on 03/26/2016 1:04:47 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown, are by desperate appliance relieved, or not at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

In order for there to be treason there has to be an ENEMY which we do not have OFFICIALLY. No declaration of war no treason.


64 posted on 03/26/2016 2:09:36 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Nationalist, Patriot, Trumpman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson