Posted on 03/26/2016 11:14:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
As any good politician he is saying what you want to hear In reality this is what the government is doing and Both of the Cruzes are part of it
It’s words vs actions. They say one thing but are doing something else.
Notice:
The employment across countries without documentation. And trade .. Not fair or equal. No borders within North America
If she had a blue dress or the equivalent Of in this case air plane tickets and car rental records to Maryland. Deposits into account might be supportive evidence
"She's Got The Look"
(youtube song video link)
Do you have a link for this that involves something other than someone on twitter making this claim? I can find nothing from GQ. No connection with Jeff Roe. Nothing.
Why would Cruz denounce a photo that was taken LEGITIMATELY and with Melanias approval years ago?
Theres nothing to denounce.
This is why....this quote is from the photographer himself Antoine Verglas
“I never gave any approval for this image to be used anywhere else but GQ in the U.K. It puts me in a very weird situation as I have to protect my intellectual property and the privacy of Melania Trump,” the photographer says, adding that he’s already talking to his attorney. “I don’t want those pictures to be used in certain ways which are inappropriate.”
It seems as though Liz Maier and her fellow confederates appropriated an image without permission...Seems like a court case is in the offing. But that is what happens when we are dealing with Globalists that support Pervy Ted...they will take and take and take from the little guy until there is nothing left to take and then they will take your dignity too.
I think the pic is a photoshop....BLow it up and look at her neck. I am not an image specialist so maybe someone better can tell me...
Seekandfind
g this I have been though the internet to no avail on this information. I got CTH to stop posting in their comments because there is no real source. I have written GQ, COndeNast and WrightMedia to find out who ordered the print. Hopefully I will have answer next week. Then again I may not get an answer. But If I do, I will post the information here.
Savage got out of the wrong side of bed that day.... He is prone to flights of fancy.
This veteran who hanged out with Heidi [and tweeted a topless photo of her], I hope she was not married at the time?
At least she looks happy.
On the greater scheme of things, I’m willing to not take offense if Savage dumps Trump over this.
It’s a step up for him compared to past errors.
So speaking well of Savage:
Borders, language, culture.
He was way ahead of the rest in talk radio on those issues.
I reset my browser to see an image for a change. When it comes to looks, she’s devastating and has nothing to be ashamed of.
Rush warned his audience to beware of letting it ‘all hang out’. But if she had a college fling, I certainly don’t hold it against her in this generation.
RE: Savage got out of the wrong side of bed that day
So, you’re telling us the source Savage says he “trusts with my life” who tells him that the Nation Enquirer story is FALSE is a lie and that there is no such person?
Thank you very much for your diligence. It is highly appreciated.
It will not be in vain as this will be for the cause of finding out the truth.
RE: As any good politician he is saying what you want to hear In reality this is what the government is doing and Both of the Cruzes are part of it
OK, let’s look at his ACTIONS in the past, past actions are a better indicator of future actions:
* It would have been convenient for him to pander tot he Iowa ethanol lobby by saying he’d continue government subsidies to this industry. He refused. Probably the only one among the candidates who refused to — IN IOWA!
* The Tea Party helped Cruz win the Texas Senate seat precisely because he attacked the bailouts for banks and the auto industry.
* He opposed the United Nations arms trade treaty in Sep. 2013 which would have affected America’s second amendment rights.
* On June 24, 2015, by a vote of 60-38, the Senate approved trade promotion authority (TPA) as part of HR 2146 - Defending Public Safety Employees’ Retirement Act. Cruz was one of five Republicans to vote against the bill.
Now, Ted Cruz has never been shy about his support for free trade, and this he said openly when debating Trump on the 45% tariffs against China, As a general matter, he believes(as did Ronald Reagan) that free trade is good for America; when we open up foreign markets, it helps American farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers.
He did say that when it comes to jobs lost in the USA, government regulations and burdensome, complicated taxes are the chief culprit behind why it is not attractive for companies to stay in the USA or even manufacture here.
Now the above is a legitimate disagreement. If you believe that TARIFFS are the way to go against China and repudiating NAFTA ( an agreement in place for 20 years ) is the path to prosperity,go ahead and vote for Trump.
I personally think that if he had his way,you won;t get close to anything you think you’ll get ( including the lost jobs ).
I have no idea about all that, that source etc and Savage may be exaggerating..who knows?
RE: I have no idea about all that, that source etc and Savage may be
Or the source might be telling the truth.
“Now, Ted Cruz has never been shy about his support for free trade,”
ROTFLMFAO!!
There IS no free trade!
Get a clue!
RE: There IS no free trade!
Get a clue!
_________________________
If I support Justices that are strict constitutionalists and we have what we have today, does that mean I should not support it?
Replace “ strict constitutionalist” with “free trade” and the intent is the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.