Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigbob
The National Enquirer’s statement here is meaningless (and I say that as a Trump supporter).

To survive, the NE needs a constant flow of confidential info (tips, if you will). And they need to protect those sources. Suppose it was Trump. Would the NE say, "Yep, it was Trump. Good guess, Ted."

19 posted on 03/26/2016 8:02:16 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right
The National Enquirer’s statement here is meaningless (and I say that as a Trump supporter).

No, it isn't meaningless. NE didn't give up their source, they just eliminated Trump as a possible source. If Trump was the source, the National Enquirer would have kept quiet about it.

97 posted on 03/26/2016 9:20:13 AM PDT by upsdriver (I support Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

Except lots of proof that it was Rubio’s people.


99 posted on 03/26/2016 9:22:05 AM PDT by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson