Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

Whiel this might be detrimental to dear leader’s plans, these ‘scientists’ are STILL not being honest- the math does not add up Period!

The atmosphere has 0.04% CO2 in it

Man is responsible for 3.4% of that 0.04%— Which means that:

Man’s CO2 comprises just 0.00136% of the atmosphere

Can these ‘scientists’ please explain to the world how just 0.00136% of our atmosphere can possibly capture and create enough heat to warm the globe?

Try putting a 1 inch by one inch piece of cloth on you at night and see if that keeps you warm on a cold night

There is no thick layer of CO2 blanketing the globe- there simply is not enough CO2 to do anything in regards to changing the climate- period!

The math does not support the lie that man is causing global climate change-

Hell- the math doesn’t even support the lie that ALL sources and amounts of CO2 are causing climate change globally—

So while htis artilce refutes dear leader’s lies- it still isn’t good news because these ‘sceitntists’ will likely just recalculate and reassert new alarmism results based on a lie-

[[“It would require rates of change in our energy infrastructure and energy mix that have never happened in world history and that are extremely unlikely to be achieved,” Glenn Jones, a professor of marine sciences at Texas A&M who co-authored the study, said]]

NONE of that would help- not one iota- Is he seriously suggesting that getting our production of CO2 down from a total mass of 0.00136% to 0.00135% will stop global warming? Seriously? Let’s suppose we got it down to 0.000136% the Fact remains that there was never enough CO2 in the atmosphere- let alone CO2 produced by man i n the atmosphere, do do anything regarding our global climate-

Man is not causing climate change-

CO2 is not causing climate change- it can’t- there isn’t anywhere near enough of it to do so

By the way- our planet is at roughly 400 ppm CO2 which these ‘scientists’ tell us is a ‘tipping point’ and will ‘be catastrophic’- Yet in the past this planet had nearly 1200 ppm

and another inconvenient truth for them- CO2 rises ALWAYS follow temperature rises by 800-1000 years- that alone is proof that CO2 is not causing the temperature rises and falls- funny how facts have a way of inconveniently refuting claims- Ice core samples show that CO2 only rises 100’s of years AFTER temperates rise- so unless CO2 has supernatural powers, and is able to ‘preemptively warm the planet BEFORE it rises into the atmosphere- 100’s of years before it does ifnact- then CO2 is not causing climate change- period!


18 posted on 03/26/2016 9:56:28 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

Or simply:

1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.

2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.

3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.

4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.

5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.

6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.

7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.

Crickets..................


19 posted on 03/26/2016 10:01:21 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson