Posted on 03/25/2016 6:49:29 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Oh dear, the National Enquirer has come out with a story claiming evidence of multiple sexual trysts by presidential candidate Senator Ted Cruz.
Worse yet for the Cruz camp, the framework within the article is structurally very concerning:
The National Enquirer is indeed a tabloid – and as such there are various grains of salt that should be applied when reviewing anything they present.
However, that said, they have been unfortunately accurate for more than a few presidential hopefuls: Gary Hart, Jesse Jackson and John Edwards to name a few of the more infamous examples.
Beyond the story itself there's a few presenting elements which point to a high degree of confidence, and as a consequence 'legal avoidance', on the publishers' part.
Firstly, they post pictures of the collective mistresses. NE would never legally "go there" if they did not hold a very reasonable certainty the outlined players were factually part of the story.
Secondly, there's at least one face in the group that is easily identifiable.
When you accept the NE editorial/legal requirement for research and attributed comment prior to publication, you recognize there is more than a strong probability each of the outlined group (pictured) was contacted prior to publication; and one of those is very close to the Donald Trump campaign. Ergo, it's entirely likely presidential candidate Donald Trump knew this story was coming out.
Which puts candidate Trump's prior discussion and opinion of media libel in a strangely much larger, and more substantially prescient, aspect. 3-D political strategy not withstanding.
The National Enquirer has essentially baited the hook in a typical manner and one famously utilized by Andrew Breitbart.
So now they wait and see if, and how, the Cruz campaign responds. It is entirely possible the story could explode exponentially depending on the severity of any denials or admissions therein.
UPDATE 1: Since the publication first hit the newsstands (depends on region) the Twitter-sphere has lit up with conversation about the scandal. It appears many political followers believe they have identified two three of the blurred out images within the National Enquirer story.
If these people on twitter are correct, this story is not soon to be easily dismissed by the Ted Cruz presidential campaign:
https://twitter.com/Fleet_Forest/status/713147569170292736?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
https://twitter.com/Wadded_Panties/status/713149536814833664?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Amanda Carpenter is the conservative activist, CNN contributor, and writer for Mark Levin and the Conservative Review who recently published a "BLACKLIST" targeting anyone who supports Ted Cruz's primary opponent, Donald Trump.
UPDATE#2 – It appears three of the pictured mystery women from the National Enquirer article have now been identified.
3 of Cruz's alleged mistresses have been identified: Katrina Pierson, Sarah Isgur Flores, and Amanda Carpenter. https://t.co/GUF55Kli31— Joel Luther (@joel_luther) March 25, 2016
LINK https://twitter.com/joel_luther/status/713192498617827328/photo/1
Interestingly Sarah Isgur Flores, in addition to being a well known political operative, was also the campaign manager for Carly Fiorina. And that little factoid brings an earlier discovery into question; where the Super-PAC for Ted Cruz (Keep the Promise) actually sent the Super-PAC for Carly Fiorina (Carly for America "CfA") $500,000
That distribution from one candidate's Super-PAC to another, raised the eyebrows of the Federal Election Commission who inquired about the rather unusual transaction.
UPDATE #4 – The Plot Thickens. Apparently, at least part of this story was very well known amid the political circles (pundits, columnists, reporters etc.) who swirl around the various presidential campaign camps.
It appears the sexual exploits of Ted Cruz was the story many were curious about back in late February and early March.
A Breitbart reporter held the information but never released it; according to most common speculation because the owners/operators/editors of the outlet determined it was not in alignment with their political affiliations:
For those of you less familiar with Twitter and "Hashtags" there was a considerable amount of apparent discussion under the hashtag "#TheThing", where "The Thing" was knowledge of the Ted Cruz affairs.
If you look up #TheThing and go back to March 10th – March 14th, what you'll find are multiple conversations about finding someone, anyone, to report on the Ted Cruz affairs. The group pushing for the requested articles were seemingly all supporters of Marco Rubio.
The apparent thinking was if they could get the media to pick-up the story prior to Super Tuesday, it would finish off Ted Cruz and allow Marco Rubio to win in several key elections and states.
UNFORTUNATELY, the TRUTH-TELLERS ran into the corporate side of the media enterprises. Breitbart owned by pro-Cruz Super-PAC funder Robert Mercer was one of the roadblocks. The editor, Ben Shapiro, also now being named as one of the political advocates who would not allow his chosen candidate to be "OUTED". Shapiro is also the Editor of The Daily Wire, which is also owned by a Pro-Cruz Super-PAC team, The Wilks Brothers.
It appears Shapiro buried and blocked the story because he, along with others, didn't want to see Cruz negatively impacted. Unfortunately, this is brutal confirmation of the type of media bias we have discussed before.
Pro-Rubio and Pro-Cruz corporate media intercepts refusing to allow sunlight upon their preferred candidate(s). (Salem Communications: Hugh Hewitt et al, NRO, Human Events, Twitchy, etc) and Pro-Cruz sites like Conservative Review (Mark Levin, and unfortunately Amanda Carpenter), Right Scoop, Red State, Insurgent etc. with an obvious reason to bury or not allow the story to surface.
This obnoxious Cruz gaggle is making me even more excited for #TheThing
— Maggie Cucci (@maggie_cucci) March 12, 2016
Once Senator Marco Rubio lost Florida, the incentive for public airing of the Ted Cruz marital affairs was immediately diminished.
Those within the #StopTrump campaign now preferring the sexual trysts did not surface because the damage only benefits Donald Trump, a candidate they despise and are working actively to defeat.
Many of the former political types who wanted to see the story surface have now joined Team Cruz and would prefer the story have stayed hidden.
Ambition for Two […] They'd met on the 2000 George W. Bush campaign, when they worked three cubicles apart, and in the years since, they'd gone from an apartment in Northern Virginia to a 19th-floor condo in Houston to a series of three-star hotels in early-primary states. Heidi had taken an unpaid leave from her lucrative job at Goldman Sachs to join Ted on the trail.
But in the earliest days of their marriage, they weren't always together. At a time when Ted Cruz felt unsatisfied with his track in Washington, he made a decision to take a high-profile job in Austin — as Texas's solicitor general — that provided a testing ground for his conservative arguments but also forced him to move 1,500 miles from Heidi, who continued working at the Treasury Department in Washington.
The job ultimately helped to launch Ted Cruz's political career. It also nearly backfired: He and Heidi weathered several years of strained, long-distance commuting. And when Heidi finally moved to Texas, the strain only grew. She fell into a depression, what Cruz calls the couple's "difficult chapter."
Cruz, now 45, looks back on that decision 13 years ago to leave Washington as an essential part of his rise as a top-tier Republican presidential candidate. The choice bore the Cruz hallmarks: ambition, a willingness to take major risks and confidence that he could pull it off. In an interview with The Washington Post, Cruz also said that the move also shows how he and Heidi work in tandem. They both held aspirations for their careers, and they were willing to live apart to chase their goals.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2016/01/29/deciderscruz/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_cruzdecider-150pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
Earlier today Ted Cruz spoke mightily and angrily on the campaign trail: VIDEO: SNIVELING COWARD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cPgdMGf2Pk
Well said. I agree.
^^This!
"They" have not found one person to speak against Trump....his ex-wives, his butler, fired employees....they all speak very highly of Donald Trump.The worst they could come up with was a fake story about tearing down an old woman's home, and a long ago magazine cover of Melania.
Pray for the success and safety of Donald Trump and his family.
Is the Republican Party based on anything anymore? I thought running candidates that appeal to Democrats was where the whole Rino thing came about. It certainly isn't about convincing them with Republican principles.
If that's "your party", you can keep it. I'm becoming convinced Trump is going to destroy the Republican Party altogether, not just the establishment.
I see that House of Cards is just fluff compared to what really goes on in politics. This is like double-agent stuff: know the transaction is going to come out, get the money from who-knows-where, arrange to buy the rights to the photo, get it to the PAC in violation of the law, blow up the Internet with an "attack" ad, and leave a hot smoking trail right back to the target which is Cruz. Brilliant!
Had to pay for the rights to use them in an add.
You mean like saying no Christian could possibly vote for Trump.
Poor Teddy Bares. Just like Teddy himself, lies are all you have to spread. Poor Teddy Bares, supporting a loser and a philanderer!
If they ran that picture in an add without paying for it I will eat your hat.
You really get off on the innuendo that seeks to destroy this family, don’t you?
Unless the affairs are true. Then, it still isn’t the innuendo that destroys a family. Do you really think that we all owe our cheating neighbors and fellow Americans protection for our sinning? That’s a weird morality.
Also, Jeff Roe, campaign manager for Ted Cruz, did, in fact secure the rights for the photo of Mrs. Trump from GQ (Google it).
Liz Mair, the PAC monster that put out the ad for Utah. Illegal coordination right there, folks. Trump was right and Cruz lied again.
This is what will get him into legal trouble. Grabbing all the girls and screwing them in toilets and closets might lose him his Christian supporters. But paying off his mistress through her PAC and coordinating with the other PAC? He’s breaking laws.
Sad thing is he is giving conservatives a bad name. We said he was one.
Obviously you don’t get the Cult of Personality joke.
LOL! If it hurts Cruz, then it's a dastardly deed. If it hurts his opponent, it's "justice". Do tell.
From our perspective it looks foolish and impossible to hide. But, from his viewpoint when he did it, why would he think it would be found out? Assuming he could trust the person at GQ and obviously they trusted the PAC that was helping Cruz’s Campaign...from the “front” side it probably looked pretty safe. There are huge egos at play here, people that are accustomed to controlling the world around them.
From our perspective it looks foolish and impossible to hide. But, from his viewpoint when he did it, why would he think it would be found out? Assuming he could trust the person at GQ and obviously they trusted the PAC that was helping Cruz’s Campaign...from the “front” side it probably looked pretty safe. There are huge egos at play here, people that are accustomed to controlling the world around them.
I’m sure she’s known about this and doesn’t care, as long as she continues to get her money and power, what difference does is make?
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/world-exclusive-obama-divorce-bombshell/
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/latest-hillary-clinton-confirms-brain-crisis/
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/83-pound-angelina-jolie-anorexic-dying/
I heard about 30 seconds of Levin last night.
Mark said if this story about Cruz is true he will drop him in 2 seconds.
It's turning out Mark is safe, the story isn't true, it sounds like there aren't 5, there are 8.
Ping to post 163?
Keep telling yourself that when Trump turns out to be worse than Obozo.
"Could possibly". That puts it in the low range.
The man has no respect for anyone or anything except himself. So why should any of us respect him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.