I thought it was posted he clarified his statement by saying he meant the GOP obstructionism for the last 8 years
In the context of the whole statement, I can't believe that anyone would buy into that interpretation.... and besides, who would leave it dangling out there for someone to assume that interpretation? Here is a rough transcription of the whole comment....."....if you believe we have finally come to the point where we could put the awful legacy of the last 8 years behind us and the 7 years before that when we were practising trickle down economics and no regulation in Washington which is what caused the crash, then you should vote for her....because she's the only person who basically has good ideas, will tell you how she's going pay for them, can be the commander in chief, and is a proven change-maker with Republicans and Democrats and Independents alike.