“There is value in simply asking someone, ‘If you feel comfortable, I would like to talk to you sometime about X. I have been reading a lot about the topic, and I am interested in hearing your perspective,’” the professors wrote to their law students in a lesson on how to engage in arguments.”
OK Mr. Profs, how about coming here and “discussing” this issue. I think a good place for this discussion would be at my shooting range where you could yell your position from the 25yd line while holding a target before you. You can hear my response: One report from me should be considered a no, two a stronger no and three or more an emphatic no.
““There is value in simply asking someone, ‘If you feel comfortable, I would like to talk to you sometime about X. I have been reading a lot about the topic, and I am interested in hearing your perspective,’” the professors wrote to their law students in a lesson on how to engage in arguments.””
—
Well gee, why didn’t they think of that during the Ferguson and Baltimore riots.?
We could have all talked to the rioters about “their perspective”
I’m sure it would have calmed them right down,/s
.
Herein lies the problem. Ask someone if they feel comfortable. When the person says no, discussion over. So, remember there is no comfort with these people, they are always upset,. Ergo, the college campuses now being upset over an ALL lives matter poster, Trump 2016 scrawled in chalk etc... They are upset before the conversation even begins. They don’t want to hear another opinion anyway. When something so stupid as not seeing that all lives do matter, then you cannot discuss rationally with that person anyway. My new thought for the week, MLK Jr gave his speech in 1963 for nothing. Liberals desire neither color blindness or character to define anyone. They want color and no character.