Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lockbox
I think it is positively awful that someone earning $250,000 should not have subsidized housing. (I am still a little foggy on how someone earning Minimum Wage can earn $250,000) but the good politicians at Palo Alto apparently know more about economics than I do.

I really don't care if people cannot afford the mortgages associated with living in this overly inflated California housing bubble by Silicon Valley. If they don't make enough for their mortgage, it is not up to the taxpayers to subsidize them. Let them telecommute or commute 40 or more miles a day from a home they can afford, if that's their choice. Bottom line is that this robbing Peter to subsidize Paul is WRONG on all levels. It is not government's job to fund the equivalent of Section 8 housing for middle and upper middle class people.

15 posted on 03/24/2016 6:09:30 AM PDT by MasterGunner01 ( To err is human, to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MasterGunner01
Telecommute for the Police, that would make the BLM group happy! But could work for the teachers.....

Maybe Palo Alto could use what I call the George Clooney Program. Basically the rich have large homes with many empty bedrooms. So let's fill up those empty bedrooms George! Solves the problem.

16 posted on 03/24/2016 6:38:13 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson