Posted on 03/23/2016 9:56:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
Because if Trump fails at this - Hillary will be the POTUS.
Exactly
Trump will be crushed by Hillary in a landslide, and he is going to bring the GOPe and its toady Republican Party down with him.
And with 3rd place finishes in Ohio and Florida, I’m sure lyin’ Ted would do much better. /s
If gop nominates Trump, the totally classless bully who knows less about basic civics and foreign policy I am gone.
We were hoping you were gone after damning all of us FReepers to hell in your 867 post opus.
RINO’s apprently cannot win and neither will Trump. Were I younger, I’d be buying a place in rural Ireland or Costa Rica.
Why do you think this?
I’ve seen this all over the place, mostly from “establishment” republican so-called leaders. Yet I have not seen anyone produce even non-credible polling data that supports that emotional claim.
The Republican party has completely missed the message, and are WAY underestimating the impact they’ve caused, especially these last 7 years.
There is no enthusiasm for Hitlery. It ain’t happening there.
If The Donald is successful in securing the party’s nomination, we will have record voter turn out and we’re going to see 61+% for Trump, COMPLETELY BLOWING AWAY the DemocRatic voter fraud machine. There are so many closet Donald supporters out there its nuts. They aren’t speaking to polesters - they may be embarassed to admit their support, but its there. Its real.
There, my equally emotional, non-factual data-driven argument is done.
Trump 61+% in a history-making landslide that will put the media in a frenzy to question “how can this be?!?!?”
You know what might help shore up the conservate vote? Attack their candidate with nasty liar nasty liar lyin Canadian and have his supporters insanely echo it for 6 months, like chimps throwing feces. That should help shore up the non-Trump (60%) voters by the convention.
I think this because Trump has lost something like 48 out of 50 head to head polls vs. Hillary. I think this because Trump has huge negatives among the 60-65 percent of voters that do not support him. I think this because all the folks discounting Trump’s poll numbers sound exactly like those who were trashing all those polls showing Obama beating Romney four years ago.
I think this because Trump does not know specifics like what makes up the nuclear Triad.
I think this because Bill Clinton, who is much smarter than any GOP politician out there, cunningly encouraged Trump to run. However, I think Bill Clinton had no idea his plan would be this wildly successful. I think he just thought it would stir up trouble for the GOP.
This is will turn out just like Claire McCaskill’s move to get Todd Akin to be her opponent worked out. McCaskill knew there was no way the GOPe would support Todd in the general election, just like Bill Clinton knows there is no way the GOPe will let nominee Trump win the general.
This is all good however, because the GOPe-led Republican Party needs to be destroyed in November.
What if the voters nominate Trump? Are you still gone (I mean more than you are already)?
@mitchellvii @HouseCracka
Cruz has won 7 caucus states.
1 mixed caucus/primary (TX)
Just 1 full primary state (OK)
Yeah, that's a pattern.— Angelfire (@Angelfi81906197) March 23, 2016
Where will you go?
Hey, be nice; it’s a tough day for the Cruz shills.
Their eager hopes of rubbing in Utah have gotten the response of ‘I ain’t even mad’ followed by counter-gloating about 58 in AZ. With NY and NJ in the near future, Cruz is shut out of the first round of voting completely, and the only way he’s getting the nomination is if he finishes his conversion into GOPe stooge.
All they have left to keep them going is their seething hatred for Trump and Trump supporters.
Not with the Democrat Party, it isn’t.
He's been doing that. And, given that he's been consistent with that message ever since he became a celebrity, it would seem he means it.
Plus, he has a long record of getting things done. He stands up to the nattering nabobs, and when things don't work, he gets rid of them.
It's about time we had a businessman for president, and not another lawyer.
“It’s about time we had a businessman for president, and not another lawyer. “
NO lawyers.
NO Harvard lawyers (or Yale either)
NO career politicians
No Bushies.
CLEAR ?
Okay.
What about Clintons? Why did you leave them out? One Clinton was more than enough
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.