Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife
...could be dismissed or laid off by the 18-member Board of Regents using maddeningly vague criteria:“when such an action is deemed necessary due to a budget or program decision requiring program discontinuance,curtailment,modification or redirection.”

Those criteria don't sound very vague to me. If a program is discontinued, why *should* the university keep the personnel running that program on staff? If they aren't doing anything, they are costly dead weight. Period.

17 posted on 03/23/2016 3:47:47 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

“If a program is discontinued, why *should* the university keep the personnel running that program on staff?”

It is generally true (although I don’t know the details of the old policy at Wisconsin) that tenure doesn’t protect faculty if their entire program or department is abolished. What is disturbing about the new policy at Wisconsin is inclusion of program “redirection.” I would be upset, for example, if Virginia Governor McAuliffe decided to “redirect” tenured UVa sociology professor Brad Wilcox out of a job because Wilcox’s research shows that children fare best in intact, male-female marriages. In the current climate on university campuses, it is conservative professors who have the most to lose if tenure is abolished.


38 posted on 03/23/2016 6:39:00 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson