Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

“Don’t twist it....I’m talking about getting rid of problems with these organizations....period.”

*******

When speaking of BLM, EPA, etc, I’d prefer to get RID of THEM and that would get rid of their problems. I call BS on any “outdoorsmen” who think letting the states handle public lands is worse than the Feds handling it. Local control is what people in the West want.


11 posted on 03/20/2016 6:20:36 AM PDT by Mac n Jac (www.vetsfightingms.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mac n Jac

People in the west did fine with lands under federal control for a century or so when they were run according to their original purpose, as multi-use land for the public to access for timber, ranching, minerals, and recreation including hunting. The problem has come in the last few decades as the organizations that run them have been taken over by eco-Nazis who want to shut them off from their original intent, and Clinton and Obama started designating public lands as “monuments” to close them off. If the federal agencies would get back to the original mission of making lands available for public use I don’t think it would be an issue.


24 posted on 03/20/2016 1:59:38 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson