Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
That was the main reason: the gang of 8.

I have to disagree with the list of his positives. He spoke like a robot, he had accomplished nothing, he was not a nbc, and appeared more like a college punk than leader of the free world. During one debate he acted like a juvenile and suddenly was kept attacking Trump with silly slurs and not specifics. I never understood and still do not why anybody would think he could handle the job of president.

51 posted on 03/18/2016 11:48:04 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: apocalypto

My take on Rubio.

I think he was very polished, looks good, speaks well. I’m amazed at how well he speaks—it does sound rehearsed but then when you realize some of the questions that came up the answer couldn’t be rehearsed.

While it wasn’t presidential I thought it was funny as hell when he attacked Trump. It was giving Trump a taste of his own medicine. The Trump supporters didn’t like it but then no one likes when Trump attacks like a kid in school against the other people. So I was cool with it as I didn’t want Rubio to win anyway.


52 posted on 03/18/2016 11:56:02 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson