If those things are that nasty or spiteful, I don't have to make it all about me by running out in some silly effort to be 'relevant'; the action is bad enough that it is obviously nasty, spiteful, or illegal, with or without my comment.
Nor does my lack of comment constitute approval. It just means I didn't add to the chorus.
A Christian would indeed have and exlre6ss feelings at threats to any family.
Okay. I'm not sure what "and exlre6ss feelings" are. But I think I get your drift.
Sure, anyone would find threatening someone's family despicable. I'm not all over twitter or Fecebook, or any of that other stuff over it because it is, prima facie, deplorable to threaten someone's family.
My condemnation of an act diesn't make the act any worse, nor me any better. It will still be the same in the eyes of The Almighty. The acts of the people who did them speak for themselves, and that isn't a pretty statement about the person or persons involved.
Expressed is the word you questioned and apparently your computer messes up with Facebook as “Fecebook” and doesn’t as “diesn’t”. So everyone makes typing errors.
As regards your opinion of threats I am grateful that we are neither friends nor enemies as you seem to be a callous person whom I would definitely not enjoy or be comfortable knowing. You are correct The Almighty does know. Jesus did defend those wronged so I will follow that example. I wish you a pleasant day.