Jeff Flake: I Would Rather Have a Less-Liberal Nominee Like Merrick Garland than One Hillary Would Pick
Her Heinous is responsible for more murders of women and children than Countess Elizabeth Bathory..
As mentioned in related threads, the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the so-called right to have an abortion. Not only did state sovereignty-igoring, activist justices wrongly establish from the bench the PC right to have an abortion, but the left must fight to keep a majority of pro-abortion activist justices on the bench to carry on the lie that having abortion is a constitutionally protected right.
How can it be at stake Hilbilary if as you idiots claim, its in the Constitution?
Is it really not in there but a sympathetic loser scrotus court imagined it to be there? And that a rational court might in the future reverse such an insane idea?
When HiLIARy says ‘legal abortion,’ she means abortion on demand, full-term, at taxpayer expense.
You have to understand leftist-ese.
Obama, through Garland, has put the two most emotional constitutional questions of today on the ballot.
Energy will be required.
Staying at home is not an option.
It’s Trump or Cruz. Kasich is a nice man, but his prior votes and actions prove he’s not the man to be nominating justices. The 2A must be supported, and assault weapons ban votes with personal thank yous from WJC poison the well of trust.
If Hillary wants this person s help in murdering and butchering any more innocent children,, she will have to nominate him herself. (Pray she doesn’t get that chance!)
That tempering elective abortions requires ponderance at all, should be an affront to our culture.
She’s more interested in having our guns taken away, for obvious reasons.