Skip to comments.
New York Times Tosses Garlands at ‘Brilliant...Moderate’ Obama Nominee Merrick Garland
NewsBusters.org ^
| March 16, 2016
| Clay Waters
Posted on 03/16/2016 2:31:17 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Kaslin
‘Brilliant...Moderate’ Obama Nominee Merrick Garland
No 'ffin way!
21
posted on
03/16/2016 3:41:54 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Kaslin
Moderate? Loves late-term abortion and hates the 2nd Amendment. I’d say he’s hard-core lefty.
22
posted on
03/16/2016 3:42:11 PM PDT
by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: MinuteGal
Would you and NM make the same superior pecksniff comments to the poster if the appointee were Catholic and the press made the same assessment?pecksniff...LOL...I'd have to remember that one...
Wasn't Scalia a prominent Catholic ?
Why would I make any comment about him being replaced by another Catholic...?
23
posted on
03/16/2016 3:44:29 PM PDT
by
Popman
24
posted on
03/16/2016 3:52:13 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: Kaslin; Jim Robinson
Perhaps Freepers could provide a suitable conservative nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.
25
posted on
03/16/2016 3:55:05 PM PDT
by
airborne
To: Kaslin
Which means We REALLY don't want him!!!
26
posted on
03/16/2016 4:09:54 PM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so that others don't have to do it for you.)
To: Kaslin; All
27
posted on
03/16/2016 4:14:23 PM PDT
by
airborne
To: MinuteGal
Would you and NM make the same superior pecksniff comments Stuff it.
to the poster if the appointee were Catholic and the press made the same assessment?
Get this straight: I don't give a rat's behind what skin color the nominee has, nor do I care what religion he follows (mohammedanism isn't a religion).
I care that the nominee understand that words mean things, and that the Constitution means what it means, and is not some malleable thing that he can re-invent. It's called "strict constructionism", and it was the late and lamented Antonin Scalia's philosophy.
I'm sick of everything being about race, or religion, or minority status, or some other idiotic group identity. If you want to play identity politics, that's your business. Don't expect to get away with it though.
28
posted on
03/16/2016 6:10:17 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(A plague o' both your houses.)
To: Kaslin
The BEST use for the NYT is to line a birdcage or use under the pot when you’re repotting a plant. Otherwise, it has no discernible utility.
29
posted on
03/16/2016 8:14:58 PM PDT
by
EinNYC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
