Obama Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland has ‘very liberal view of gun rights’

Washington Times ^ | 03/16/2016 | Dave Boyer

[Bubba Gump Shrimp]

No matter what or who he nominates, or ANY dem nominates, it doesn’t matter what their record is.

You can bet that the dems will have enough dirt on that guy to dictate how he votes in the future.

That’s the number one credential on a SCOTUS nominee now-a-days: “Do we own him?” “Can we embarrass him and his family?” “Can he be blackmailed?”

If this guy has been proposed, you can bet they have pictures of him at a glory hole truck stop.

[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

[Mouton]

Look at it this way, if I were them, I’d want guns banned too.

[imardmd1]

From the article:

. . . Scalia’s most important opinions, D.C. vs. Heller, which affirmed that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to keep and bear arms.

No! Let that be corrected, and firmly: Scalia’s most important opinions, D.C. vs. Heller, which affirmed that the Second Amendment acknowledges and stands in awe of a God-given individual right to keep and bear arms, recognized by the Declaration of Independence in its enumeration of the right to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit of happiness.

[Chickensoup]

Saw his picture, he has a little NPR self satisfied moral preening sort of smile.

I can just hear his nasal voice...

[aimhigh]

The article must have been written by a liberal. Garland’s 2A views are not left-wing. The are EXTREME left-wing. The press never wants to use the word, ‘extreme’ with liberals. This time, it really fits.

[allblues]

There are two things about Garland that you can bet the farm on. He will vote against the 2nd amendment and for abortion. There is no chance whatsoever that Bammy would nominate someone with a strict Constitutional view of either the 2nd amendment or abortion “rights”.

[jacob allen]

Jamie “The Wall” Gorelick’s right hand man. Remember she was on the 911 Cover Up Commission, when really she was the one most responsible for 911. Can anyone say Able Danger!

[Smokin' Joe]

We don’t need another Justice hostile to the Constitution.

[MacMattico]

I agree he doesn't even deserve consideration. I also think Obama knows this and will spin it to help Hillary. I haven't really looked into his background but I have heard he plays both sides of the fence, meaning he's issued some opinions or voted for things that liberals would hate. Those things should be dug up and fed to the liberal masses. Oppose him, but make the democrats be the ones to shut this thing down!