[jjsheridan5]

It’s clear that my contention has a good good deal more validity than yours.

You can't lend validity to a vacuous statement by adding useless hypothetical general election polls as "evidence". If you can't see that Trump has tremendous traction among independents and blue-collar democrats, and that Cruz has none, then, yes, you are both wrong and willfully blind.

[traderrob6]

“You can’t lend validity to a vacuous statement by adding useless hypothetical general election polls as “evidence...”

Those “useless hypothetical election polls” are the best evidence we have at this point in time and are at least more predictive then the hyped anecdotal “evidence” and over emotional conjecture Trump supporters put so much faith in.

Trump has the highest negatives of any candidate in the race and that includes Hillary.

Vacuous would describe your assertions better than mine as at least I’m basing my opinion on what facts are available and not limbic wishful thinking.