Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators accuse State Dept. of defying Congress with $500M UN climate payment
Fellowship Of The Minds ^ | 3/12/2016 | DCG

Posted on 03/14/2016 5:56:16 AM PDT by HomerBohn

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

It's not like $500M is that big of a deal. Just tack it on to the $19,000,000,000,000+ national debt!

Via Fox News: Two Republican senators are accusing the State Department of misusing taxpayer dollars by green-lighting $500 million for a United Nations climate change program without first obtaining congressional approval. The senators now are demanding the department justify the “cloak-and-dagger” contribution to the Green Climate Fund (GCF) – even threatening legal action.

Lawyers cannot replace the constitutional requirement that only Congress can appropriate money,” Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., said, adding that he’s demanding a “full legal analysis.”

Gardner, in a statement to FoxNews.com, alleged the department was trying to “wave a magic wand and write a half-billion dollar check to a Green Climate Fund that they admit was never authorized by Congress.” He also vowed to “pursue legislative action that prevents cloak-and-dagger re-programming of money outside of congressional approval.”

At the center of the dispute is whether the State Department abused its authority in shifting funds between an existing program and the climate fund. The Obama administration – despite resistance from congressional Republicans — has committed the U.S. to contributing $3 billion to the fund, a program established by the United Nations to help poor countries adopt clean energy technologies to address climate change. Nearly 200 other nations have agreed to provide $100 billion per year by 2020, from private and public sources.

Along with Gardner, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., maintains Congress has not allocated any funding for what he calls the “international climate change slush fund” and has in fact “prohibited the transfer of funds to create new programs.”

The State Department acknowledges the funding was never explicitly approved by Congress – but argues the department was within its authority to shift funding to the Green Climate Fund, because Congress did not explicitly prohibit funding the GCF.

Under questioning by Barrasso at a March 8 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Heather Higginbottom told the committee the funds were diverted from the department’s Economic Support Fund — which provides economic funding to foreign countries — to the GCF after a full review by department lawyers.

State Department spokeswoman Katherine Pfaff also confirmed to FoxNews.com the source of the funding was the economic fund, but could not say from which exact program the money came. And she bluntly addressed the GOP senators’ accusation. “Did Congress authorize the Green Climate Fund? No,” she said, adding that department lawyers “reviewed the authority and the process under which we can do it.” The administration, meanwhile, has requested another $750 million for the GCF in its fiscal 2017 budget. Higginbottom also insisted they were not required to notify Congress about the transfer from the Economic Support Fund.

At the hearing, though, Barrasso said the first installment of the $3 billion pledge was “a blatant misuse of taxpayer dollars.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: climatechange; colorado; corygardner; energy; epa; getunoutofus; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; gorebalwarming; johnbarrasso; methane; opec; petroleum; popefrancis; romancatholicism; statedepartment; traitors; wyoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: HomerBohn

That’s easy to cure.Just deduct $500. Million from the State Department Budget.Watch them scream like children not getting their lollipop.


21 posted on 03/14/2016 6:29:39 AM PDT by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
Lawyers cannot replace the constitutional requirement that only Congress can appropriate money,”

McConnell & Co. haven't turned all that over to the Executive Branch yet? They had better get on it. They may only have until January to get it done.

22 posted on 03/14/2016 6:32:29 AM PDT by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberaliI sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
... but argues the department was within its authority to shift funding to the Green Climate Fund, because Congress did not explicitly prohibit funding the GCF

That's a ridiculous position. In essence, State's position requires Congress to specify everything that every agency may not spend money on, otherwise, it is permissible. Under that requirement, each State Department employee could receive a 10-week cruise every year, or a free beachfront house in Maui, or even a new Tesla for every member of each employee's household.

23 posted on 03/14/2016 6:52:54 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Only two????? where is the rest of Congress???


24 posted on 03/14/2016 6:56:09 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Eeeeeeeeeazzzzy......................!
Just take the $$$$$ out of their (bleeping) BUDGET!!

Oooops...now THAT would take balls, wouldn’t it?????
My bad.


25 posted on 03/14/2016 7:56:53 AM PDT by Flintlock (The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

They’re off wanking each other in the cloakroom.


26 posted on 03/14/2016 10:46:37 AM PDT by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

“Accuses...” So what? The complicit a-holes keep approving their budgets. Criminals all.


27 posted on 03/15/2016 2:01:56 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

“Accuses...” So what? The complicit a-holes keep approving their budgets. Criminals all.


28 posted on 03/15/2016 2:02:29 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson