Dog shootings?
What the heck does that have to do with unconstitutional invasion of privacy?
The cop illegally confiscated all electronic devices she and her husband owned.
Then lied.
Deny global warming, attorney general Lynch wants to prosecute you.
You tell me.
What the heck does that have to do with unconstitutional invasion of privacy?
You are extremely naive, besides being flat-out wrong on issues. The woman was unfairly assaulted and arrested for stepping between a cop and her leashed dog (wagging its tail at the cop). Cop said it was his right to kill the dog, even though it was friendly and leashed. Her husband recorded the whole thing on her iPhone. Cops confiscated all their devices. Woman went to trial for assault with a weapon against a cop, based on the cop's lies.
For over a month the family tried to get the iPhone back from the cops. Meanwhile, the cops were trying to bypass the security on the iPhone to delete the incriminating recording. The family's attorneys were finally able to get the iPhone returned, the recording shown to the jury and she was acquitted of all charges. She had no weapon, was not attacking the cop, and the cop indeed assaulted her.
This is what we are talking about. Abuse of government authority and unconstitutional invasion of privacy that are supposed to be preventable by our Constitution. Yet you and others seek to tear down our rights against an overbearing government. Shame on you.