Many SCOTUS cases say the opposite of what you do. No SCOTUS case says what you do.
I cited the US Supreme court, what more do you want?
No SCOTUS case says what you do
On the contrary, if one reads those SCOTUS cases very carefully, applying the legal definitions to the terms as the law defines them to be, everyone of those cases are constitutional. The problem is with “natural born”, all others are citizens by statute, including the Wong Kim Ark case of 1898, which is very cleverly written, and which was also written by Justice Gray, however, Justice Gray does not change the meaning of NBC. WKA was born in the US, he perfected his citizenship before leaving for China, thus he was naturalized by the issuance of a US passport. WKA already had the birth on the soil factor, and upon his swearing allegiance to the US before receiving his passport, he perfected his allegiance to the US.