Yeah, Im looking around. I was wondering if the state had anything like that in their statutes?
They knew who he was.
They knew where he was living and where he was going.
His driving posed no kind of threat until he was boxed in.
And no one had been involved with any kind of life-threatening felony.
Just because he said they were going to have to kill him doesnt give them the freedom to do so or even make it necessary.
> Brower v. County of Inyo
> City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris
> Tennessee v. Garner
A quote from a discussion paper from the DOJ:
Fixed roadblocks, which block road to extent that little or no outlet remains.
"Fixed roadblocks are extremely dangerous and are rarely justifiable."
You have to remember that the apologists will NEVER seek the truth about .govthug overreach.
They're not interested in questioning their own allegiances. :)