Posted on 03/06/2016 12:30:24 PM PST by Hostage
‘Sounds to me’ sounds like something the greedy class action plaintiffs lawyers would love to see you hear (and read).
What you say is true and probably is a factor into why the class action plaintiff lawyers are having a tough time making something stick (because seminar participants made money and are still benefitting).
I agree it is a big nothing.
The reason it merits its own thread is to leave a record of Megan Kelly’s smear tactics.
I wonder why a billionaire developer would get in to thus sort of late night a TV informercial type stuff.
Like that guy on the boat with women in bikinis, Tom Vu.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYqDS9i8zJw
:-)
It’s always easy to buy a book and attempt to teach oneself. But not all people think that way, they prefer real live interaction, Q&A, and connections to get started.
Why would my opinion make any difference on the judge or jury? I’m sure they are warned against reading articles and online opinions about the case.
Leverage.
Though they may deny it, some Judges are indeed influenced by public opinion.
Yep, sometimes it’s better to buy a $5.00 book (the updated $50.00 version and $200.00 tapes) and a $1500.00 teacher. That’s what they tell new meat, I mean, business owners, at Amway. Gotta spend money (on me) to make money (for me)!
I never subscribe to such seminars and I also look down on them in general. But they are not illegal and they are not always scams.
Whether the seminars were in good taste or not is not the issue. The issue is the continuing yellow journalism.
If you’re interested in real scams by politicians, look no further than Barack Obama’s and Al Gore’s Man-Made Global Warming now conveniently labeled Climate Change.
I think we are in for an even bigger one that will make 2008 failure look like a blip. Hope I'm wrong.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Fraud lightweight Marco made a TV ad on TrumpU featuring 2 people who signed these letters:
http://www.98percentapproval.com/uploads/Kevin_Scott_Survey.pdf
http://www.98percentapproval.com/uploads/Bob_Guillo_Survey.pdf
9:32 AM - 6 Mar 2016
http://www.98percentapproval.com/
Hope you’re wrong too.
The point being that not many (in the building industry) saw the banking collapse coming.
Many saw a 30% haircut in valuations and leveraged accordingly, but a full-scale banking collapse?
The banks near completely withdrew from lending for new construction or remodels. The carnage was greater than ever in history for the building industry.
The banks were and are largely still the market makers although I see some financing entities have smartened up and created independent financing sources.
I am without a clear sense of what will happen should Donald Trump (or any republican) be elected this November. Many sense (as do I at times) that the markets will tumble and the banks will go Greek as you suggest.
On the other hand Trump has impressed me via some old CSPAN clips of his testifying before congressional subcommittees that he is a master of masters in all things business and commercial including banking, insurance, taxes, regulatory, trade, negotiation, valuation, leveraging/deleveraging, currency. I can’t imagine a better person at the helm than him at this time in history.
I like Cruz but believe his time has not yet come.
Do you know how many people actually took the course? I’ve been looking around and can’t find a number. If there were a million course-takers and 5,000 of them joined the class action lawsuit, then the 98% satisfaction rate isn’t too very far out of line.
But if the 10,000 surveys they have over at that website represent all the course takers and 5,000 of them have decided to join the class action lawsuit, then the 98% is just a fabrication.
Any idea where I can get the actual number of paying students?
Thank you dynoman. And to hawkaw, dynoman has linked a document dated to May 2011:
http://www.98percentapproval.com/uploads/A_rating.pdf
which shows the name change to “The Trump Entrepreneur Initiative” and an A-rating. So Donald once again told the truth in that the rating was elevated from D- to A.
One thing I have admired Donald Trump for, and in fact, all of his family, is their principle of telling the truth. I have verified their truth-telling trait countless times even though when I started to research Donald Trump last summer I was thinking he was a liar and a fraud (even I can be misled at times a priori by media mischaracterizations).
The class was certified at about 30,000 but that does not mean all 30,000 are contesting. More than 90% of class litigants usually throw the opt-out card mailer in the trash and are opted in by default without ever knowing until they receive an update on the case. And usually, litigants receive very very little while the class action plaintiff lawyers walk away with millions. That’s the way it is.
This is a nuisance lawsuit.
The fraudulent business practices investigations pre-date the campaign by years. Did they do all that just to prepare for this moment?
So under normal circumstances, 30,000 mailers would have resulted in 27,000 litigants? Why would this case have resulted in so few? I mean, they have only 5,000 folks in the lawsuit, don't they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
