Posted on 03/06/2016 6:08:59 AM PST by Kaslin
If you believe The 2016 Mitt Romney Edition, Donald Trump is the most corrupt candidate to ever run for the White House and we must all oppose The Donald and vote for Mitt's and Jeb's love child, little Marco Rubio.
Love child, never meant to be Love child, (scorned by) society Love child, always second best Love child, different from the rest
Sorry about that.
I got a little lost there for a wee bit.
I started channeling Diana Ross after I mentioned Rubio's name.
Weird, eh?
Anyway. Where was I?
Oh, yeah. I was talking about Mitt's on-high exhortation to us poor, bamboozled plebeians ... the unthinking rubes of Obamaland ... who're so easily led astray ... who're so lost in space that we're in need of The 2016 Mitt Romney Edition to point us to the North Star and take us by the hand and lead our lost backsides to the Romney Promised Land, glory to God.
Help us, Mitt! Help us!
Now, granted, The 2016 Mitt Romney Edition didn't come right out and say to “Vote for Marco Pequeño ”, but Romney definitely did rag on Trump like a bitter ex-girlfriend scalding her former favored flame.
Yes, I said it.
Once upon a time, Mitt was madly in love with Donald.
Once upon a time, Mitt was madly in love with Donald. I don’t know what happened, but The 2012 Mitt Romney Edition, not to be confused with the all new 2016 Mitt Romney Edition, once doted over Donald and courted his favor like a love sick puppy.
Matter of fact, in 2012 Paul Anka wrote this...
And they called it puppy love Oh, I guess they'll never know How a young Mitt really feels And why he loves Donald so
… after watching Mitt pursue Trump's endorsement (and his money) in the last Presidential election.
But that was then and this is now and obviously Mitt's bitter. I mean... wow. That screed he gave last week against Donald was the exact opposite (and I mean the exact opposite) of what Willard once waxed eloquently about with his then-love interest, Donald J. Trump.
So, why doth Romney rage?
Well, I'm guessin' it has less to do with patriotism and more to do with personal pettiness and political envy. But, then again, hell if I know and heck if I care. That said, there is one thing I'd like to bring up that I really haven't heard addressed and I kind of find interesting, namely ... Trump's kids are very impressive.
Which is really weird because, if you listen to and believe Donald's detractors, like Mitt, one would think he would've spawned kids that would make Miley Cyrus look like a penitent nun.
Y'all, help me here. I'm confused.
If Trump's such an evil SOB, of shoddy character, with no moral compass, who doesn't really love America, then why are his kids so sharp, solid, smart and a great addition to this grand American experiment in self-governance? You'd think that such a supposed scalawag would have kids who'd give the Kardashians' crass clan a run for their sex-tape money. But no. Donald, Jr., Eric and Ivanka are brilliant and I would bet that they make most of the Donald hater's adult children look like unaccomplished, booger-pickin' chuckleheads. But I could, very possibly, be wrong.
By the way, I know several people who talk major crap about the comb-over candidate and, yet, Trump's kids trump their twenty-something louts, hands down. No contest.
I believe Spider-Man once said that a “tree is known by it's fruit” and “wisdom is vindicated by it's children.”
No, wait... that wasn't Spider-Man. It was Jesus. Stupid me. Anyway … the point is that who a person is gets reduced down to and showcased within their children.
Awww ... did that hurt?
Look, don't shoot me. Jesus said it, not moi. Take it up with him.
Paul, not The Beatle, but the Apostle, said that one of the qualifications for a leader in the church is that he must have dignified children, in all things; and if his children are whacked, well ... he can't lead; because if he can't lead his own house then why the heck should he lead a church?
Succinctly, if your kids are mess then you shouldn't tell us how to live. In the words of songwriter, Jonathan Edwards, “f you can't even run your own life, I'll be damned if you'll run mine – sunshine.”
Now, granted, Trump's not a minister of the gospel but, like I said, I do find it interesting that, not one, but the whole lot of Trump's brood, are grade A, non-drug-booze-government tit-addled-indolent-leeches but pretty amazing young charges who bring excellence to this game of life and, heretofore, honor to the Trump name.
Obviously, they had an alcoholic cross dresser watch them on the stoop when he wasn't mainlining smack, and they went to the local ghetto public school.
Oh wait.
They actually could afford the best child care and schools!
See, it's so easy even the libs could figure it out, but even smarter and more conservative people could too. You think that might have made a difference?
(Nice Alinsky style preempt attempt, though.)
Trump has given credit to the all the Mothers for their part in raising his children.
Wrong. He was recruited. Recruited and signed up, to deliver the message of the Party leadership (McConnell and crew) to the unwashed masses. Donald is a pariah! Do not touch him, do not go near him -- unclean! Unclean!
Yeah, right.
The people who're unclean are the scum who recruited black Democrat preachers and voters to take money to vote in the Mississippi primary a couple of years ago, to beat Tea Party challenger McDaniel, who was very close to "primary'ing" Thad Cochran, a tired old RiNO bull. The leader of that effort was Mitch McConnell, helped iirc by (now lobbyist) Trent Lott and the younger Barbour.
It was one of the most scurrilous campaigns in U.S. senatorial history, directed by the party leaders against a Tea Party Republican.
I'm pretty sure you aren't talking about Laura Bush and Nancy Reagan .... or Maureen Reagan (who died of melanoma behind her knee where she couldn't see). Amy Carter was a piece of work, one of the Ford children (Stephen) had problems but the Ford boys were pretty clean-looking, healthy young men. Nixon's daughters married well, and Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg was a talented young woman who also married well; it was a shame about her brother but she's aged well and had a pretty good life so far.
The Bush twins had their escapades but were good-looking girls (enough to attract a creep who tried to stalk/harass one of them, but not for long!), which leaves for discussion purposes Chel and the Obama girls. Both have been out of the spotlight, Chel choosing to "lean in" suicidally the last three or four years, taking part in her felon mother's campaigns. She's going to get burned, but hell, do I really care? (No.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.