Posted on 03/06/2016 6:08:59 AM PST by Kaslin
If you believe The 2016 Mitt Romney Edition, Donald Trump is the most corrupt candidate to ever run for the White House and we must all oppose The Donald and vote for Mitt's and Jeb's love child, little Marco Rubio.
Love child, never meant to be Love child, (scorned by) society Love child, always second best Love child, different from the rest
Sorry about that.
I got a little lost there for a wee bit.
I started channeling Diana Ross after I mentioned Rubio's name.
Weird, eh?
Anyway. Where was I?
Oh, yeah. I was talking about Mitt's on-high exhortation to us poor, bamboozled plebeians ... the unthinking rubes of Obamaland ... who're so easily led astray ... who're so lost in space that we're in need of The 2016 Mitt Romney Edition to point us to the North Star and take us by the hand and lead our lost backsides to the Romney Promised Land, glory to God.
Help us, Mitt! Help us!
Now, granted, The 2016 Mitt Romney Edition didn't come right out and say to “Vote for Marco Pequeño ”, but Romney definitely did rag on Trump like a bitter ex-girlfriend scalding her former favored flame.
Yes, I said it.
Once upon a time, Mitt was madly in love with Donald.
Once upon a time, Mitt was madly in love with Donald. I don’t know what happened, but The 2012 Mitt Romney Edition, not to be confused with the all new 2016 Mitt Romney Edition, once doted over Donald and courted his favor like a love sick puppy.
Matter of fact, in 2012 Paul Anka wrote this...
And they called it puppy love Oh, I guess they'll never know How a young Mitt really feels And why he loves Donald so
… after watching Mitt pursue Trump's endorsement (and his money) in the last Presidential election.
But that was then and this is now and obviously Mitt's bitter. I mean... wow. That screed he gave last week against Donald was the exact opposite (and I mean the exact opposite) of what Willard once waxed eloquently about with his then-love interest, Donald J. Trump.
So, why doth Romney rage?
Well, I'm guessin' it has less to do with patriotism and more to do with personal pettiness and political envy. But, then again, hell if I know and heck if I care. That said, there is one thing I'd like to bring up that I really haven't heard addressed and I kind of find interesting, namely ... Trump's kids are very impressive.
Which is really weird because, if you listen to and believe Donald's detractors, like Mitt, one would think he would've spawned kids that would make Miley Cyrus look like a penitent nun.
Y'all, help me here. I'm confused.
If Trump's such an evil SOB, of shoddy character, with no moral compass, who doesn't really love America, then why are his kids so sharp, solid, smart and a great addition to this grand American experiment in self-governance? You'd think that such a supposed scalawag would have kids who'd give the Kardashians' crass clan a run for their sex-tape money. But no. Donald, Jr., Eric and Ivanka are brilliant and I would bet that they make most of the Donald hater's adult children look like unaccomplished, booger-pickin' chuckleheads. But I could, very possibly, be wrong.
By the way, I know several people who talk major crap about the comb-over candidate and, yet, Trump's kids trump their twenty-something louts, hands down. No contest.
I believe Spider-Man once said that a “tree is known by it's fruit” and “wisdom is vindicated by it's children.”
No, wait... that wasn't Spider-Man. It was Jesus. Stupid me. Anyway … the point is that who a person is gets reduced down to and showcased within their children.
Awww ... did that hurt?
Look, don't shoot me. Jesus said it, not moi. Take it up with him.
Paul, not The Beatle, but the Apostle, said that one of the qualifications for a leader in the church is that he must have dignified children, in all things; and if his children are whacked, well ... he can't lead; because if he can't lead his own house then why the heck should he lead a church?
Succinctly, if your kids are mess then you shouldn't tell us how to live. In the words of songwriter, Jonathan Edwards, “f you can't even run your own life, I'll be damned if you'll run mine – sunshine.”
Now, granted, Trump's not a minister of the gospel but, like I said, I do find it interesting that, not one, but the whole lot of Trump's brood, are grade A, non-drug-booze-government tit-addled-indolent-leeches but pretty amazing young charges who bring excellence to this game of life and, heretofore, honor to the Trump name.
Great nannies and boarding schools?
“I am not against you. “
Naps, not a single person would hold it against you if you were.
My wife talks that way too, even in front of me. Don’t understand the psychology behind it. I very rarely do. Don’t understand the psychology behind it.
but the kids aren't running, he is. Nice try at a puff piece, though.
Please someone post a picture of Malia rolling her eyes.
For people how might not have seen this
Trump is a perfectionist
The children have been interviewed several times. Why not listen to what they have to say about their father? Hmmmm...?
Over the years I’ve seen interviews with various women in The Donald’s life (business and social), and a good many commented on what “a great father” he is to his kids.
Still, I’ve got to believe their mothers were/are a significant part of their lives as well.
There is no doubt in my mind that they weren’t
“...but in my mind a man has no greater statement of who he REALLY is than his grown children.”
I agree with that 100%.
What is this supposed to mean. Just because he’s a good father doesn’t make him a conservative.
But the real test is.......how much of who a man is gets passed on to his grandchildren, and is reflected in them when they become mature adults???????
That, IMHO, is the ultimate test.
The Trump children did have nannies though, but I can find nothing that they went to boarding schools
And yet the Clinton spawn has done nothing and is nothing.
Al Gore’s children are a mess.
Hell, even Reagan only had two worth anything.
It’s the leader of the household. Plan and simple.
She is mama bear.
Far more intense now, for obvious reasons, but not at all unusual.
The calendar of open primaries are going to be very hard for Cruz.
Obama’;s kids are POUTY, SPOLIED BRATS!!! They NEVER smile......and they are always dressed inappropriately!
NO!! Maureen was a biological child and she was a TREASURE!!! Michael was also....it was Nancy’s 2 that are AWFUL!!
“..Give their mom some credit too.”
Exactly, especially since it’s usually the mom who spends the most time with them and raises them the most.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
