Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SENTINEL
The constitution is clear on federal land ownership, it LIMITS it to ports, forts and 10 square miles (D.C.). In Alaska the feds have taken over 80% of the state.

Article I, Section 8: "...and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;" That restriction if for land purchased from the state. Where does the Constitution restrict land owned by the government before the state was created?

17 posted on 03/06/2016 4:13:25 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

You are correct, that section assumes the state is already a state, otherwise the land could not have been bought from it by the feds in the first place.

The question then is, what does the Constitution say concerning how States get created and added?

Did it have provisions for territories being created first, and then States?

And how is it that the Midwest States, from Oklahoma up to the Dakotas, have less percentage of federally owned land than the States to the west of them?

(Texas was its own nation, thus the tiny percentage of fed owned land there)


28 posted on 03/06/2016 5:22:50 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson