Posted on 03/05/2016 2:57:56 PM PST by nickcarraway
Makes sense to me. As long as women get a choice men should too.
Men can do that now. After 18 years of garnished wages they are home free with no birth pains.
They can also keep it in their pants or borrow some galoshes from PP.
More “rights” to be irresponsible.
You have to admit it - liberalism is much more fun than conservatism... at least in the short term.
“And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!”
Kipling.
Can women do that to? Why would you tell them to go to Planned Parenthood.
Good luck with that one.
Women can keep it in their pants or use protection. No difference. In takes two to tango unless you are islamic and then it’s rape.
You post says the responsibility is all men. And it’s in Planned Parenthood’s vested interest to get paid for abortions, so I think your giving them credit is highly misguided.
I can’t say I’m a fan of the idea, but if women are going to have that right, then men should generally have some sort of recourse as well.
“On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: ‘The Wages of Sin is Death.’”
Actually, this is an incredibly clever way to cut down on abortions...
“Babe, I’m sorry, but I’m gonna have to demand that you get an abortion because I’m just not ready to be a father. I’ve set up an appointment for you at Planned Parenthood on Monday at 9am.”
“What you talking about, sucker? It’ll be a cold day in Hades before you make me get an abortion. I’M DEMANDING you go get a job and start giving me a check every month cause I’M HAVING THIS BABY!”
It used to be said that the biggest abortion boosters of all were single cavaliers under the age of 35. Then Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy wanted to get in on the act too.
Because every child needs at least one parent who wants him dead ...
For some reason, the American people don't believe this.
I believe perhaps I did not make myself clear.
Both the male and female are responsible for any impregnation.
Either one could just say no or wear protection. My assumption was one or more were too stupid to know the repercussions and may need to use a free service such as PP.
PP was a reference, not an endorsement.
A recap ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c931dQ2UnNA&index=11&list=RDiY1SDW3AB-4
Very clever.
Well, sadly Planned Parenthood and condemns cause more abortions, not less. You can’t just listen to P.R.
There are at least two cases in the U.S. where a couple who hired a surrogate to have a baby are trying to force the surrogate to have an abortion. It’s only a matter of time before a court does the forcing...
Graveyard humor.
Why do they have to kill the child? Couldn’t one or the other parent sell him on the international adoption market? There would be a very high price if both parents were ethnic Swedes.
Put another way, women have the right to murder someone that inconveniences them. Why shouldn’t men have the same right? Equal protection and all that...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.