Because he threatened to water-board anyone who tries to hurt us?
Anything to thwart the will of the voters.
Yeah, Hillary will be much better. </S>
It looks like there will be 75 more job openings in a trump administration
Those people have no business being in national security. A shooting revolution is coming, I tell ya!
There ARE no GOP NSL’s.
LOL!
What is that? Some ad hoc BS made up to fight the "crises"?
RINOS are taking a massive dump in their pants!
Because the secret deals setting the traitors up for life in a one world government will be exposed.
This must be part of the lame-brained ‘all out’ attack on Trump coming today. Romney, McCain and now this. What a pack of losers. Trump’s stock is gaining in my eyes.
What percentage of these national security leaders are Obama and Clinton appointees? (Not that I’m all that sure about GWB’s judgement, either.)
Did these guys issue a similar letter about the illegal infiltrator in chief’s islamonazi invasion of America, or his enabling his Iranian islamonazi comrades to build up a nuclear bomb ICBM Arsenal aimed at their Great satan USA?
“National security” so-called experts who are for open borders.
Traitors, losers and money grubbers, like Michael Chertoff, former Homeland Security director under Bush the 2nd who made tons of money when he put the nudie scanners in airports. The company that placed the scanners was partially owned by Chertoff.
Because Trump is a bump in the road to the total destruction of America.
Well gosh, with a track record like the GOP national security experts have, we better pay attention. /S
100% pussies who believe in appeasement, islam is a religion of peace, open borders, and domestic spying.
You’re trying your hardest men, but no more kudos for being a participant. You’ve already made this country the weakest it’s been in years, so just do your jobs and let WE the people decide elections.
One sentence stand out!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“His vision of American influence and power in the world is wildly inconsistent and unmoored in principle. He swings from isolationism to military adventurism within the space of one sentence.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do they have trouble ciphering his words?
That’ll work.
So they are saying that he would be exactly the same as Obama?