Skip to comments.
Republicans May ‘Look at Alternatives’ if a ‘Disaster’ Candidate Like Trump Becomes Nomin
Breitbart ^
| February 29,2016
| by JORDAN SCHACHTEL
Posted on 02/29/2016 4:58:48 PM PST by Hojczyk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-136 next last
To: Hojczyk
The GOPe, captains of the Titanic, are worried about the horrid weather when the ship pulls into port.
To: georgiarat
The GOPe will not allow Trump or Cruz to become the nominee if at all possible. Cruz and Trump supporters have to realize we are in this together to take down the GOPe.
With GOP leaders publicly spouting seditious and even indirect murderous threats against the Party front-runner, these Party leaders have forsaken all their rights and privileges to serve any longer.
By their abdicating the stated Republican Party principles in order to stay in their plush offices, they have deposed themselves, yet they won't leave. But they shall, in due season. And not with pomp and valor. And they shall be remembered for what they have done to our Nation.
To: Hojczyk
then the GOP drives its own stake in its heart once Hillary is sworn in.
To: Obadiah
The GOP wanted more people voting, and now Trump has done that the GOP does not want it.
What the GOP really wants is to keep lock stock in step with the left wing, have their open borders, and to hell with social issues so they can too enjoy their elitist cocktail parties in DC with the liberals and socialists.
64
posted on
02/29/2016 5:24:29 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Migraine
Worried for the party, never has been worried for the country.
Able to fight us the voter, unable to fight the left wing.
I think we all know by now that the GOP for the most part is with the left wing and for their agenda.
65
posted on
02/29/2016 5:26:03 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Hojczyk
This statement by John Sununu simply defies logic.
If you introduce another candidate - after Trump is the nominee - it will further divide the Repubs - and Hillary will have an even better chance of skating to victory.
You can’t get much more stupid then that.
66
posted on
02/29/2016 5:27:16 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
("Peace Through Strength")
To: JRochelle
67
posted on
02/29/2016 5:27:16 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Pilgrim's Progress
68
posted on
02/29/2016 5:27:37 PM PST
by
Zarro
(Ben Carson 2016)
To: georgiarat
69
posted on
02/29/2016 5:28:39 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Migraine
Notice how hes worried about disaster for the PARTY? Wheres his worry about the country?great point!
70
posted on
02/29/2016 5:28:55 PM PST
by
uncitizen
(Investigate Scaliagate!)
To: Hojczyk
Can someone please tell the RNC that it is WE THE PEOPLE who vote and to let the people decide???
71
posted on
02/29/2016 5:29:03 PM PST
by
hsmomx3
(GO STEELERS!!!!!!)
To: Obadiah
Bush I is not doing much now.
To: central_va
They simply cannot deal with all “The Winning”
73
posted on
02/29/2016 5:29:36 PM PST
by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: manc
Ah no.
I have standards. I will never vote Trump or Hillary.
EVER. EVER.
74
posted on
02/29/2016 5:29:59 PM PST
by
JRochelle
(A vote for Trump in the primary is a vote for Hillary in November.)
To: Hojczyk
Now what was that loyalty pledge all about again?
75
posted on
02/29/2016 5:30:28 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to to God!)
To: manc
We are all experiencing what the Southerners felt around 1860 about FedGov.
Trump is Fort Sumter in human form.
76
posted on
02/29/2016 5:31:35 PM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Hojczyk
When a major political party is publicly plotting to derail its leading candidate, it makes one wonder what happened to the country.
To: Zarro
The Tories used to decide who the leaders would be under the federalist system . . . but we are a republic . . . but I’m thinking we may well have lost it.
78
posted on
02/29/2016 5:32:36 PM PST
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: JRochelle
So you don’t vote, but you have a socialist hack voting .
This your vote will not count, because you could not be bothered, but their vote will count because they could be bothered.
Got it.
Out of curiosity did you want Bush and then now Rubio, and are you the establishment elitist type who is having a baby tantrum because the voters don’t want your boy?
79
posted on
02/29/2016 5:33:35 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: central_va
The way these elituist are going it’s as if they want another war with the people.
80
posted on
02/29/2016 5:34:50 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson