"For more than a generation, economists, trade experts and policymakers, including both Republican and Democratic presidents, have told us that we could do little about globalization and the brutal displacement of old industries and jobs, and that we might as well just get used to it. Indeed, we were told, the United States must lead this charge: Free trade in the West helped to win the Cold War, after all, and the United States emerged as the sole superpower. This self-conceit infected both political parties. It was Clinton, after all, who pushed through the North American Free Trade Agreement and triangulated way to agreement with then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich on a workfare replacement to the welfare system.
Most economists agree that opening up markets, especially in the aftermath of the Cold War, did produce a wealthier world overall. At the same time, however, globalizations advocates have plainly overstated its benefits and underestimated its hazards, including social upheaval. The open trading system that Washington adopted more aggressively than any other major countryparticularly, the giant economies of China, Germany and Japanhas exacerbated inequalities at home far more than the government was prepared for. And those who challenged the wisdom of the day, who pushed for fair trade (more tariffs, unemployment insurance and worker protections) over free trade, were typically branded protectionists and driven from the discussion.
If alive today all the founding fathers would have been driven from the discussion.